Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT HOPED THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO THIS <br />STUDY AND LATER FIND OUT THAT WE CANNOT HOOK UP TO THE CITY SYSTEM. <br />MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS VERY PRELIMIN- <br />ARY BUT THAT ELLIOT GROSH OF THE CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENT INFORMED HIM <br />THAT THE CITY HAS DISCUSSED THIS MATERIAL IN REGARD TO THE POSSIBILITY <br />OF TYING IN THE PEBBLE BAY SERVICE AREA TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH SYSTEM. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT SEVERAL THINGS WOULD BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY, INCLUD- <br />ING A TV CAMERA INSPECTION AND REPORT, MR, ROBBINS STRESSED THAT HIS <br />DISCUSSION WITH MR. GROSH WAS UNOFFICIAL, BUT FELT THE CITY WOULD BE <br />WILLING TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COUNTY ON THE ALLOCATION. HE STATED THAT <br />THE COUNTY WOULD BE A WHOLESALE CUSTOMER AT THE CONNECTION POINT, WHICH <br />WOULD BE AT AIA AND SILVER SHORES ROAD, JUST SOUTH OF THE PEBBLE PAY AREA, <br />MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT THERE IS AN EASEMENT COMING OUT OF PEBBLE BAY <br />WHERE THE CITY HAS.A WATER LINE, AND WE MAY RUN A FORCE MAIN THERE, WHICH <br />WOULD ELIMINATE THE ACQUISITION OF A DOT PERMIT. HE CONTINUED THAT IT <br />WAS INDICATED THAT THE CITY MAY REQUIRE THE COUNTY TO PAY A PRO -RATA SHARE <br />OF THE FORCE MAIN CONNECTION; THE LINE HAS DEPRECIATED IN VALUE SO IT <br />WOULD BE A PRO -RATA SHARE OF THE DEPRECIATED VALUE OF THE LINE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT THIS LOOKS AS IF IT IS IN THE <br />BALL PARK OF GETTING DONE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP ON GOING. <br />MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT A HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN <br />PERFORMED IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA; THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENGINEERING <br />STUDIES WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE. <br />140TION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER LYONS, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK AS RECOMMENDED BY <br />THE JOINT VENTURE. <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS ASKED THE FINANCE DIRECTOR <br />IF THE COUNTY WAS COLLECTING BILLS FROM THAT AREA AND WHETHER IT INVOLVED <br />AN ENTERPRISE ACCOUNT. <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON REPLIED THAT THIS IS NOT AN ENTERPRISE <br />ACCOUNT, AND SINCE THIS IS UNANTICIPATED REVENUE, IT WAS PLACED ON A <br />HOLD PATTERN. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON VARIOUS ITEMS MENTIONED IN THE SCOPE <br />OF WORK, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT ITEM 7, WHICH STATES, "PERFORM COST <br />SHARING ANALYSIS FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS" WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE A CERTAIN <br />IMPACT ON INDIAN SUMMER. <br />35 <br />JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41 F`�E 5 <br />