Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF WE ACCEPT THE DEDICATION, WHOSE <br />RESPONSIBILITY IT WILL BE TO BUILD THE ROADS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WE CAN STILL PASS THAT OFF, BUT IT IS <br />A PROBLEM. NIS FEELING IS THAT WE WILL NEVER GET TO THAT POINT BECAUSE <br />THE PLAT IS SUCH THAT WHOEVER WANTS TO DEVELOP IT WILL HAVE TO VACATE <br />AND REPLAT. HE NOTED THERE IS CONSIDERABLE INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY <br />RIGHT NOW. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THE ATTORNEY IS RECOMMENDING THAT <br />THE BOARD FOLLOW UP ON THE TWO ITEMS SUGGESTED IN HIS MEMO, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS FELT THEY SHOULD BECAUSE DOING SO WOULD PUT THE COUNTY IN THE <br />BEST POSTURE POSSIBLE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 79-62 ACCEPTING OR RE- <br />AFF'IRMING A PRIOR ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION OF ENOS SUBDIVISION. <br />RESOLUTION No. 79-62 AND RESOLUTION No. 79-55, VACATING A <br />PORTION OF ENOS SUBDIVISION, AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF .JUNE 6, 1979, <br />ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES, <br />17 <br />JUL 51979 p <br />BOOK 41 PACE 84 <br />