My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/5/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
7/5/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:05:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/05/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE BOARD AT THIS TIME SHOULD GO <br />BACK TO THE SITE PLAN PROBLEM BECAUSE, ALTHOUGH WE ADDRESSED A PARTICULAR <br />SITE PLAN, SOME OF THE OTHER PROBLEMS WERE NOT ADDRESSED. HE NOTED <br />THERE WERE SOME GOOD SUGGESTIONS MADE BY ANN ROBINSON AND MAGGIE BOWMAN. <br />COMMISSIONER $IEBERT NOTED THAT SITE PLANS NOW DO NOT CALL <br />FOR ANY EVALUATION OF ROAD AND STREET SYSTEMS NOR THE DRAINAGE IN THE <br />AREA,'AND HE FELT THESE SHOULD BE ADDED CRITERIA FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. <br />HE FURTHER FELT THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS THE -TOTAL DRAINAGE PROBLEM <br />EITHER IN THE FORM OF A MORATORIUM OR BY TAKING SOME EMERGENCY ACTION. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT WE MUST LOOK AT THE TOTAL <br />PICTURE FOR THE COUNTY AND ASKED IF COMMISSIONER $IEBERT IS SUGGESTING <br />AMENDING THE $ITE PLAN ORDINANCE ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS. <br />COMMISSIONER $IEBERT WAS OF THE OPINION WE SHOULD EITHER AMEND <br />THE ORDINANCE OR GO INTO A MORATORIUM ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED THAT PERSONALLY HE DOESN'T <br />LIKE A MORATORIUM, BUT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING <br />TO WORK WITH TO MAKE ANY JUDGMENT IN THE MATTER OF DRAINAGE IN THIS <br />AREA, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE TIME TO DEVELOP SOME KIND OF FRAMEWORK <br />WITHIN WITH GOOD DECISIONS CAN BE MADE IN REGARD TO HANDLING TRAFFIC <br />AND DRAINAGE. HE ALSO FELT THAT IT IS IMPERATIVE TO INCLUDE A PROVISION <br />PROHIBITING CLEARING OF THE LAND 'PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL AS THIS <br />ALL AFFECTS DRAINAGE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS BELIEVED THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TWO ALTERNA- <br />TIVES -_ONE WOULD BE TO PROVIDE FOR ALL DRAINAGE ON SITE OR PROVIDE A <br />LOGICAL METHOD OF DRAINING THE PROPERTY THROUGH EXISTING FACILITIES. <br />MR. REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ALACHUA COUNTY NOW REQUIRES <br />THAT ANY DRAINAGE GENERATED MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE. HE NOTED THAT <br />ON SITE SYSTEMS DO NOT NECESSARILY LAST VERY LONG, BUT THEY MIGHT BE <br />THE "BAND AID" PROCEDURE WE COULD USE TO BUY SOME TIME. HE NOTED THAT <br />THE CITY OF VERO BEACH IS CONSIDERING THIS. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT "ON SITE" RETENTION ONLY <br />DEALS WITH NORMAL SITUATIONS, NOT UNUSUAL ONES SUCH AS 5" OF RAIN. HE <br />CONTINUED.THAT WE HAVE A LIST OF PROJECTS WAITING TO BE -ADDRESSED ON <br />49 <br />JUL 51979 <br />BOOK 4 1 <br />,DACE 116 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.