My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/5/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
7/5/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:05:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/05/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d <br />STATED THAT THE APPROVAL OF ANY SITE PLAN WOULD HAVE AN AFFECT ON THE <br />WHOLE AREA, AND THEREFORE, SHE FELT -THAT IT WOULD BE IN THE INTERESTS <br />OF ALL TO HAVE A MORATORIUM AND.DO LONG TERM PLANNING. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD AGREED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT WE MUST DEFINE THE AREA WE <br />ARE TALKING ABOUT, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT IT WOULD BE <br />BOUNDED BY THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE WEST, THE <br />SOUTH RELIEF CANAL ON THE SOUTH, THE INDIAN RIVER ON THE EAST AND 18TH <br />STREET AND 14TH STREET AOR THE CITY LIMITS) ON THE NORTH. HE AGREED <br />THAT A CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM SHOULD BE EMPLOYED TO DO A STUDY <br />BASED ON WHAT WE COME UP WITH. HE FELT THERE IS NO WAY THAT YOU COULD <br />RETAIN WATER ON SOME OF THE PROPERTY IN THAT AREA. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER AGREED, PARTICULARLY IN VIEW OF ALL <br />THE DEVELOPMENT THAT IS BEING PROCESSED. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR IS SUGGESTING <br />GOING SOUTH TO THE VISTA ROYALE PROPERTY, AND IT WAS GENERALLY FELT IT <br />IS BEST TO CONSIDER THE BROADER AREA SINCE IT CAN.ALWAYS BE SCALED DOWN, <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE-STATED THAT HE DOES NOT LIKE TO HAVE A MORA- <br />TORIUM AND FELT POSSIBLY WE CAN ADDRESS THIS THROUGH ADDING TO SITE <br />PLAN PROCEDURE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SATISFACTORY DRAINAGE PLAN, BUT <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER POINTED OUT THAT HIS DEPARTMENT HAS NO WAY TO <br />DETERMINE WHAT A SATISFACTORY DRAINAGE PLAN WOULD BE AT THIS POINT. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO HOW LONG A MORATORIUM SHOULD <br />BE - PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER SUGGESTED 6 MONTHS, AND COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT WAS IN FAVOR OF 60 DAYS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF YOU TIE THE SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS <br />INTO THE ACTUAL ISSUANCE OF THE NECESSARY GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS AND MAKE <br />THE APPLICANT COME FORTH WITH THESE PERMITS BEFORE THE SITE PLAN IS <br />APPROVED, DO YOU NOT ACCOMPLISH THE SAME THING. <br />THE BOARD DID NOT FEEL YOU DO, AND COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED <br />THAT TROPIC GROVE HAS MADE A DEAL WITH THE DOT TO DUMP INTO THEIR 10TH <br />STREET CANAL WHICH WILL SIMPLY END UP BY DEPRIVING SOMEONE ELSE OF A <br />PLACE TO DRAIN, AND THIS WILL JUST MUSHROOM. HE FELT WE HAVE TO HAVE A <br />MORATORIUM AND SUGGESTED 90 DAYS. <br />51 <br />J U l 51979 BOOK FAA- .�. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.