Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Adams and Commissioner Macht suggested they have their deed <br />restrictions reviewed and corrected if necessary. <br />County Attorney Collins stated his office would contact Mr. Carl for the name of the <br />attorney to determine what the problem might be. (CLERK’S NOTE: Subsequently, Mr. Carl did <br />not identify the attorney.) <br />Brian Heady <br /> thought the public interest would be served by putting the questions <br />on the permit application and the County would not have to assume any responsibility by having the <br />questions on the applications. <br /> <br />9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – THOMAS EMBRO – REQUEST <br />THTH <br />FOR LOT SPLIT ON 57 STREET WEST OF 66 AVENUE <br /> <br />th <br />Thomas Embro <br />, 927 Ocean Place, advised that he owns a lot on 57 Street west <br />th <br />of 66 Avenue that he wished to split. He had been advised that the lot was a few feet short of the <br />required 200,000 square feet and it cannot be split. He claimed other lots nearby had been split and <br />other houses in the area were built on split lots and he wanted equal treatment. <br />Chairman Ginn explained the Commission does not sit as a body to make land use <br />decisions on specific lots; there is a procedure in place where the property owner goes to the <br />Planning Department. <br />Planning Division Director Stan Boling confirmed that 200,000 square feet is an <br />absolute minimum for lot size. He noted that some parcel maps give approximate sizes and Mr. <br />Embro could not use rights-of-way as part of the calculation of his lot size. Staff would be glad to <br />look over the surveys on other lot splits. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />March 16, 2004 10 <br /> <br />