Laserfiche WebLink
CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT IF IT IS GOING TO TAKE $1,000 <br />FOR THE AUDIT, IT SHOULD REFLECT THE COST OF THE AUDIT. <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS QUESTIONED WHETHER OR <br />NOT IT IS AN ALLOWABLE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE MENTIONED THE NEW LAW WHICH REQUIRES THAT THE <br />COUNTY DO THE AUDITING THAT THE STATE HAS ALWAYS DONE, AS THEY NO LONGER <br />HAVE THE STAFF TO DO IT. HE CONTINUED THAT NOW IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY <br />AND THIS PUTS AN ADDITIONAL COST FACTOR ON THE COUNTY TAXPAYERS - HE <br />WAS HOPEFUL THAT THEY COULD GET AN EXTRA $500 OR $600 ALLOCATION ON THE <br />GRANT TO COVER THE AUDIT AS HE WOULD LIKE TO COST -OUT THE PROGRAM AS <br />MUCH AS POSSIBLE. <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS REFERRED TO THIS AS <br />"INDIRECT COSTING" AND SUGGESTED MS. CIMBEROFF ASK LEAA IF THEY COULD <br />APPLY FOR THIS AS THEY MIGHT HAVE MONEY AVAILABLE IN THAT FUND FOR <br />THIS AUDIT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />RESOLUTION N0. 79-64 IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES. <br />JUL 181979 7 <br />BOOK 41 PAGE 174 <br />