Laserfiche WebLink
Director Keating agreed with Commissioner Davis, but only in certain projects. <br />Commissioner Davis would like to see a “build-as-you-go,” rather than <br />“pay-as-you-go,” format to alleviate a lot of concerns regarding inflation. He would like to see the <br />County join the developer, let the developer build the road, and have the developer pay back the <br />County with interest. <br />George Hamner <br />, Vice Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission, posed <br />several questions to staff regarding the cost inflation factor, the policy on limiting projects to the <br />Capitol Improvement Plan (CIP), and concurrency. <br />Discussion continued regarding decisions the Board would be allowed to make <br />under Senate Bill 360. The Board learned that the Department of Transportation would be <br />involved in decisions regarding Stategic Intermodal System (SIS) roadways (I-95 and SR-60). <br />Discussion ensued and several members of the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />asked for additional detailed information from staff regarding the procedures and requirements <br />that would be mandated by Senate Bill 360 and the proportionate share ordinance. <br />Administrator Baird noticed the Impact Fee’s 15% discount was not factored into <br />the formula used by staff and requested staff to rework the formula. <br />Commissioner Lowther commented that the Proportionate Share agreement would <br />apply only to the developers with insufficient links, and the Board would have the opportunity to <br />decide whether the 15% discount should be applied. <br />George Christopher <br />, P&Z Commission member, wanted to see the Board wait <br />until they heard from the Consultant before taking action because he was troubled with only one <br />public hearing requirement and the 3-year period. <br />County Attorney Collins shared the same reservations as Mr. Christopher. He saw <br />similarities to the way utilities’ extensions currently operated and suggested that the Board set up <br />an analogous program, to add a link not on the CIP now, and structure an agreement where the <br />developer pays for it and the cost recovery comes from other people entering into similar <br />proportionate share agreements. Those costs go to repay the developer. If development stops, and <br />March 3, 2006 <br />3 <br />Public Workshop <br />Proportionate Share Ordinance <br /> <br />