My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/22/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
8/22/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 2 21979 coax, 41 PAGE 4 1 <br />COMMISSIONER -LYONS REPORTED THAT THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE <br />PRESERVATION OF FLORIDA'S BEACHES AND SHORES IS HAVING A MEETING <br />IN BAL HARBOUR ON OCTOBER 3-5, 1979, AND SINCE THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL <br />COORDINATOR WILL BE UNABLE TO ATTEND, HE WOULD LIKE TO. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR COM- <br />MISSIONER LYONS AS ABOVE. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN LOY DISCUSSED THE SCHEDULE FOR OUR BUDGETING <br />PROCEDURES AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO ADVER- <br />TISE A PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO HOW WE INTEND TO USE OUR FEDERAL <br />REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR NEXT YEAR. THE FINANCE OFFICER FIRST MUST <br />HOLD AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING TO GET THE PUBLIC INPUT ON THIS MATTER. <br />SHE CONTINUED THAT THERE IS APPROXIMATELY $500,000 THAT NEEDS TO BE <br />BUDGETED; A LOT OF IT IS CARRY-OVER. WE MUST BUDGET WHAT WE ALREADY <br />HAVE PLUS WHAT WE HAVE LEFT OVER FROM PRIOR ENTITLEMENT PERIODS. <br />THIS YEARS ENTITLEMENT IS NOT EARMARKED. SHE ASKED THE FINANCE <br />OFFICER WHAT THE CAPITAL OUTLAY ESTIMATE WAS, <br />MR. BARTON STATED THAT IT WAS AROUND $365,000 PLUS $250,000 <br />ON THE TAX ANTICIPATION NOTE, AND WE STILL HAVE $500,000 TO G0, LEAVING <br />THIS YEAR IS ANTICIPATED REVENUE IN THE RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUND CAN <br />BE FUNDED BY FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT YOU JUST USE IT AS A NON <br />AD VALOREM SOURCE. <br />FINANCE OFFICER BARTON DISCUSSED STATE REVENUE SHARING FUNDS <br />INSTEAD OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS AND PROBLEMS WITH DUAL TAXA- <br />TION. HE NOTED THAT FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING IS PARTLY BASED ON POPULA- <br />TION AND IS NOT FOR UNINCORPORATED AREAS ONLY. THE STATE REVENUE <br />SHARING FUNDS ARE 1/3 BASED ON THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH GETS <br />FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS <br />AGREED THAT THEY DO, BUT IT IS FIGURED ON THE TOTAL COUNTY POPULATION - <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.