My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/06/2008
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
03/06/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 10:16:20 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Impact Fee Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/06/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4017
Subject
Impact Fee Update Public Workshop
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7311
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. PRESENTATIONS <br />A. STAFF OVERVIEW OF IMPACT FEES <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating presented staff's overview of the Impact <br />Fees. Through a PowerPoint presentation he defined what an impact fee is and/or does, and what <br />an impact fee is not, which is a tax. He said an impact fee is a one time capital charge for new <br />development, and existing developments do not pay impact fees. An impact fee implements <br />Capital Improvement Element, and Capital Improvement Program improvements that are <br />identified by jurisdiction. <br />Director Keating outlined the legal principles that have to be met in establishing an <br />impact fee, which include a Dual Rational Nexus Test where the fees need to be proportional to <br />need, or fees spent have to provide benefits; Proportionate Share Principles, which do not charge <br />for higher level of service, or do not charge twice for the same level of service; and State law. <br />One requirement of State enacted Legislation is that fees need to be based on the most recent and <br />localized data. He stated that in order to establish or to modify an impact fee, there needs to be <br />documented information, objective criteria, and a defendable methodology, which means there <br />needs to be a detailed study done to document different aspects and or need for a change in fees. <br />Director Keating discussed the need for a defendable methodology and disclosed that <br />there are two basic methodologies for doing impact fee ordinances: a consumption based <br />methodology, and an improvements based methodology. He believed most studies are done <br />using the consumption based methodology, which is the methodology being used in this County. <br />He explained what each methodology entails and gave examples of advantages from a <br />consumption based methodology. He presented a basic impact fee formula, explained how <br />impact fee revenue may be used, and how impact fees may be distributed. <br />2 <br />March 6, 2008 <br />Public Workshop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.