Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. CONSIDERATIONOFPROPOSEDPROPORTIONATEFAIR <br /> <br />SHAREORDINANCEADMENDMENTSTOLDRCHAPTER <br /> <br />910,CONCURRENCYMANAGEMENTSYSTEM <br /> <br />(LEGISLATIVE) <br /> <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE <br />OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br /> <br />Director Keating reviewed the memorandum of April 3, 2006 using a PowerPoint <br />presentation and noted this would be the same presentation he had given at earlier meetings <br />regarding the same subject. He elaborated on the following topics: background, concurrency <br />definition, and concurrency facilities, (transportation, water, sewer, drainage, solid waste, parks & <br />schools). He commented that transportation is the challenge. He explained that Senate Bill 360 <br />requires local governments to implement school concurrency by December 2, 2006. He reviewed <br />the wording of the proportionate share ordinance and explained that our draft ordinance is <br />consistent with SB 360 but does not include some of the optional provisions; it will become part of <br />Chapter 910 of the LDRs. He reviewed the Proportionate Share Ordinance Provisions on <br />improvement projects stating that the provisions apply only to development projects that impact a <br />deficient link and it does not apply to DRIs. The applicant is required to submit an application to <br />the County. He explained the payment amount calculation, vesting, impact fee credits, the impact <br />fee credit formula, and procedures. He also gave an example of calculations for a fictional <br />Proportionate Share project. He recommended the Board review the proposed ordinance, identify <br />any necessary changes and adopt the ordinance. <br />Director Keating, County Administrator Baird, and Management & Budget Director Jason <br />E. Brown responded to questions of the Commissioners. <br /> <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. <br />April 11, 2006 12 <br /> <br />