My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/11/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
04/11/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 1:23:46 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/11/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3098
Book and Page
130, 527-559
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
300
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Guy Barber <br />, 2050 Highlands Drive SW, expounded that the taxpayer is paying for growth <br />through taxes. <br />Commissioner Wheeler addressed Mr. Barber’s comments. <br />Joseph Paladin <br /> supported SB 360 and staff’s recommendation. He thought staff had done <br />a real good job. <br />Bob Johnson <br />, Coral Wind Subdivision, thought a definition of “a credit” was needed. <br />County Administrator Baird responded that the impact fee credit is based on a formula. He <br />specified that this ordinance concerns only roads and not schools. <br />Director Keating explained the pending ordinance’s role in Mark Brackett’s development <br />and that the proportionate fair share ordinance would be used when a roadway is a deficient link <br />and not in the 5 year Capital Improvement Plan. <br />th <br />Ruth Stanbridge, <br /> 4835 66 Avenue, asked if the developer is also going to be paying for <br />the purchase of the rights-of-way. She was concerned that property of homeowners would be <br />taken to the point of “wiping out” homes. She feared that growth would take over family <br />neighborhoods. <br />Director Keating responded that right-of-way acquisition is included in the formula. <br />Bob Swift <br />, 6400 block of Glendale Road, stated that approval of this would not require the <br />Board to approve any project but it would make another tool available to solve problems and put <br />infrastructure in when growth occurs. It also would allow the County to collect the impact fees <br />before the development occurs. He encouraged the Board to adopt it. He also encouraged them to <br />amend the pending ordinance to allow a project that has no concurrency problems to move ahead. <br />At the request of Commissioner Davis, Director Keating explained the pending ordinance <br />would still be an issue if a project does not have a deficient link because they cannot be vested up <br />front. He added that after the Proportionate Fair Share Ordinance is passed, a development that <br />has a deficient link can pay a fee and get vested and the ones that do not have a deficient link <br />cannot get vested up front. <br />April 11, 2006 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.