Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 10 1979n <br />FAuE 6 <br />COLLINS READ HIM THE STATEMENT FROM THE PLAT SETTING OUT THAT THE <br />ROADS AND EASEMENTS ARE NOT DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE AND WILL NOT <br />BE MAINTAINED OR IMPROVED BY THE COUNTY. MR. PRESCOTT CONTINUED <br />TO ARGUE THAT WHAT WAS DONE WAS DONE INCORRECTLY. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY AGAIN EXPLAINED THAT THIS WAS DONE ACCORD- <br />ING TO THE PRIOR REGULATIONS; IT WOULD NOT BE RIGHT TODAY. THIS <br />SITUATION IS ONE OF THE REASONS WE HAD TO COME UP WITH THE NEW <br />REGULATIONS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER HOW THIS <br />PROBLEM COULD BE RESOLVED, AND MR, WALKER STATED THAT THERE SHOULD <br />BE A DITCH FROM CITRUS ROAD SOUTH TO THE UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN <br />LOTS 4 AND 5. THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SOME DRAINAGE FOR THIS SUBDI- <br />VISION, AND THERE IS NOT ANY THERE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED MR. PRESCOTT IF HE HAD DISCUSSED <br />THIS WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE EAST SIDE, AND MR. PRESCOTT <br />STATED THAT MOST WERE NON -COMMITTAL BECAUSE THEY FELT IT WOULD COST <br />THEM MONEY. HE NOTED THAT WHEN THE TWO VACANT LOTS ON THE EAST SIDE <br />ARE BUILT ON, IT WILL MAKE THE SITUATION MUCH WORSE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT ALL THE BOARD CAN DO IS CONTACT THE <br />DEVELOPER AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED <br />THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR BE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS OWNERS <br />WHO HAVE LOTS ON THE EAST SIDE, AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPER, AND INFORM <br />THEM OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE PLAT IN REGARD TO PUTTING <br />IN THE DRAINAGE OR MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE AS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE. <br />HE FELT IF THAT DOESN'T WORK, IT CAN THEN BE REFERRED BACK TO THE <br />BOARD FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. <br />THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED AS <br />DIRECTED BY THE ATTORNEY. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED ON THE STATUS OF <br />REVISING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF INDIAN RIVER <br />BLVD. FROM S.R. 60 TO BARBER AVENUE. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT <br />MID SOUTH ENGINEERING COMPANY CAN WORK ON THE REVISED PERMITS WITHIN <br />THE $5,000 LIMIT, BUT GREINER ENGINEERING,WHO DID THE ORIGINAL DESIGN, <br />HAS STATED THAT THEIR CHARGES FOR THE DESIGN MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED <br />UNDER THE NEW DER GUIDELINES WOULD BE MANY TIMES $5,000. WE, <br />