My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/24/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
04/24/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 4:29:18 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call The Source
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/24/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4018
Subject
The Source Special Call Meeting
Jurisdictional Determination
I Am Ministries
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7238
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
then the uses that are allowed would be single and multi -family district, and institutional (RM -6 <br />and RS -3). He revealed that staff's decision was to allow continuation of a residential treatment <br />center use on this property, restricting it. It could not be expanded beyond the current building <br />area and the 18 resident clients. <br />Director Boling presented Planning & Zoning's (PZC's) decision; cited the reasons for <br />nonconformities; and explained the purposes of nonconformities regulations and policies, as well <br />as Ch. 904.08 "cessation of nonconformities." He suggested that the "Test" was, "did the non- <br />conforming use cease for a continuous period of more than 1 year?" He pointed out that the <br />Board should focus on the word "cease" in its interpretation, as well as, the timeline facts. Under <br />Ch. 904.07(2) "reconstruction after declared disaster", he said the Test was, "do the disaster <br />reconstruction allowances guarantee reconstruction of nonconformities regardless of the one year <br />cessation regulation?" PZC determined that the use ceased for a continuous period of more than <br />1 year, and overturned staff's decision. <br />Director Boling then presented the four-part test to review PZC's decision (outlined at <br />page 16 of the backup). Staff contends that PZC failed in two (2) aspects with regards to <br />evaluating the appeal with respect to nonconformities regulations, and that PZC failed to apply <br />the provisions of §902.07(2) and County policy, which modifies the one year cessation rule when <br />the use is affected. Director Boling repeated staff's recommended that the Board review the four <br />options; find that PZC failed with respect to item #4; uphold the appeal from The Source; <br />overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission decision, and allow continuation of non- <br />conforming use with the restriction of no expansions. <br />Commissioner Wheeler sought further background on zoning uses, and cessation of use, <br />to which Director Boling responded. Commissioner Wheeler also questioned staff's opinion <br />regarding cessation and wondered what would happen if this were reverse. He argued that if a <br />April 24, 2008 20 <br />Special Call Meeting (The Source) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.