Laserfiche WebLink
permits. He felt this was the type of thing we could perhaps incorporate into bonding requirements <br />for matters shown on approved plans that exceeded our County codes and have some mechanism <br />to loop back in after the required improvements have been installed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis questioned whether the comment “bonding in cash” meant the <br />Irrevocable Letter of Credit made payable to the County. Attorney Collins said it meant cash <br />escrow in the County’s escrow fund. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowden, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Davis to approve the <br />County Attorney’s request as presented. <br /> <br />Under discussion, Chairman Neuberger commented that by mentioning the final lift <br />indicated that there was an initial lift; and, questioned whether most of the subdivisions were not <br />1” total. If so, what were they considering? <br /> <br />Attorney Collins thinks most are more than one (1) inch. <br /> <br />Director Davis provided that our County standards are fairly old and over the years they <br />have only required an inch of asphalt. That is usually adequate in smaller subdivisions, but some <br />of the larger subdivisions we are seeing with several hundred homes, that carry a lot more traffic, <br />probably needed to be designed beefier than some of the old regulations require. Many do put in <br />two (2) lifts then come in later with a final inch and a half. It would have to be put in prior to <br />Certificate of Completion and cannot bond off. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the Motion <br />carried unanimously. The Board authorized staff to present <br />this matter to the Professional Services Advisory <br />Committee for a recommendation to the Board of County <br /> <br />April 4, 2006 - 40 - <br /> <br />