My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/04/2006 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
04/04/2006 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:06:14 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/04/2006
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3098
Book and Page
130, 463-515
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
298
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioners, as requested in the memorandum of March <br />28, 2006. <br /> <br /> <br />13. COMMISSIONER ITEMS <br />A. CAR.N,C-N <br />OMMISSIONER RTHUR EUBERGER HAIRMAN ONE <br /> <br />B. CGC.W,VC <br />OMMISSIONER ARY HEELER ICE HAIRMAN <br /> 1. SB–NRR <br />TRAW ALLOT ONBINDING EFERENDUM EQUEST FOR <br />N2006GE <br />OVEMBER ENERAL LECTION <br /> <br />Vice Chairman Wheeler explained his proposal for a non-binding Straw Ballot asking <br />voters’ opinion by posing the question “Do you favor the adoption of a Special Act for Indian <br />River County by the Florida Legislature to require voter approval of any amendment to the Indian <br />River County Comprehensive Plan which expands the urban service area boundary?” <br />He attended five (5) Council meetings and three (3) approved his proposal. The City of Vero <br />Beach did not take a position and Fellsmere, with a 4-0 vote, opposed it. The only County expense <br />would be advertisement. <br /> <br />Chairman Neuberger felt they already knew the outcome and thus did not need a <br />referendum. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lowther strongly opposed the proposal and discussed the matter at length. <br />He questioned the wisdom of the matter coming back for discussion. The majority of the people <br />with whom he spoke did not know where the urban service line was. If we move forward with the <br />urban service boundary issue, he would do everything in his power to promote a property tax cap <br />associated with it. <br /> <br /> <br />April 4, 2006 - 41 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.