Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 2 41979 Bog 41 PA.PF768 <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT THIS IS NOT PURELY A RECRE- <br />ATIONAL MATTER, AND PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER AGREED, BUT POINTED OUT <br />THAT THE FUNDS DO COME PRINCIPALLY FROM RECREATIONAL SOURCES. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHAT PROCEDURE THE KIWANIS ARE <br />ASKING US TO FOLLOW, AND MR. MARSHBANKS STATED THAT HE HAS BEEN <br />WORKING WITH THE RECREATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, <br />AND HE WOULD LIKE TO -SEE IF THE COUNTY COMMISSION COULD TAKE PART <br />IN THAT WORK GROUP AND COORDINATE RECOMMENDATIONS WITH THE CITY AND <br />COUNTY - <br />IT WAS- NOTED THAT COMMISSIONER DEESON, WHO IS ABSENT TODAY, .. <br />IS ON THAT COMMITTEE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THE COMMISSION WILL ASSIST IN ANY <br />WAY POSSIBLE AND THAT POSSIBLY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, MR. THOMAS, <br />AND COMMISSIONER Loy COULD SERVE ON A COMMITTEE TO BRING RECOMMENDA- <br />TIONS BACK TO THIS BOARD, AND POSSIBLY A MEMBER FROM THE SAFETY 000N - <br />CIL. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PLANNING DIRECTOR <br />AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR TO ASSIST THE COMMITTEES ON THE <br />BICYCLE PATH PROJECT AND SAFETY CAMPAIGN. <br />TOM FAIR, SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER, FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT <br />CO., CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO REQUEST THAT THE BOARD MODIFY THE <br />DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED ON MARCH 7, 19791 RELATIVE TO THE LAKE <br />POINSETT TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT. HE READ ALOUD THE PORTION OF <br />RESOLUTION 79-26 RELATING TO SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION FROM THE DEVELOP- <br />MENT ORDER AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION <br />DETERMINATION UNDER THE FLORIDA STATUTES IS BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT <br />THE MODIFICATION REQUESTED INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL REGIONAL IMPACT RE- <br />QUIRING FURTHER REVIEW BY THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. MR. FAIR <br />EXPLAINED THAT THEIR REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION CAME ABOUT BECAUSE <br />ST. LUCIE COUNTY ISSUED THEIR DEVELOPMENT ORDER BASED ON RELOCATION <br />OF THE CORRIDOR IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, WHICH RESULTED IN THE CORRIDOR <br />ENTERING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPROXIMATELY 1-3/4 MILES AWAY FROM <br />THE LOCATION APPROVED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'S DEVELOPMENT ORDER. <br />22 <br />