My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. FAIR NOTED THAT ST. LUCIE COUNTY'S ORDER HAS PUT FP&L IN THE <br />POSITION OF HAVING A GAP IN THE TRANSMISSION LINE, AND THEY TOLD <br />ST, LUCIE COUNTY THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO ASK INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO <br />REVIEW THIS MATTER AND SEE HOW IT COULD BE WORKED OUT. HE CONTINUED <br />THAT THEY ARE ASKING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION <br />ABOUT 1-3/4 MILES IN LENGTH TO TIE THE LINES TOGETHER. MR. FAIR <br />THEN DISPLAYED A MAP SHOWING THE APPROVED LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED <br />REALIGNMENT AND DISCUSSED THE PROBLEM PRESENTED BY THE NECESSITY TO <br />AVOID THE MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER OWNED BY THE TURNPIKE <br />AUTHORITY. HE COMMENTED THAT THE CHANGE OF THE ENTRY POINT INTO <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WAS BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE PROTESTS OF ONE RANCH <br />OWNER WHO DID NOT WISH TO HAVE THE TRANSMISSION LINES ON HER PROPERTY <br />AND FURTHER NOTED THAT THEY WERE INFORMED THE REALIGNMENT WOULD <br />AFFECT ONLY ONE PROPERTY OWNER IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, BUT IT NOW <br />APPEARS THAT THIS IS NOT CORRECT. <br />MR. FAIR SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING LETTERS FROM THE TREASURE <br />COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT <br />DISTRICT, NOTING THAT THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL STATES THERE ARE <br />NO OVERRIDING SIGNIFICANT REGIONAL IMPACTS AND THE WATER MANAGEMENT <br />DISTRICT HAS NO OBJECTION TO FURTHER ALIGNMENT ALONG THE TURNPIKE. <br />a <br />L- OCT 2 41979 <br />BOOK 41 PAGE 769 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.