Laserfiche WebLink
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />To: Council Members AGUR A j E. 5_B <br />From: Staff <br />Date: September 21, 1979 Council Meeting •- <br />Subject: St. Lucie County Development Order on the FPL Midway -Lake Poinsett <br />Transmission Line <br />The Council has received a copy of St. Lucie County's Development Order that <br />approves, with conditions, the FPL Midway -Lake Poinsoft Trar.smiesion Lire. <br />Background <br />In January 1979, Council recommended the approval, with conditions, of the FPL <br />Midway -Lake Poinsett 500 KV Transmission Line.(See Exhibit 1 for the location <br />of the transmission' line.) In March 1979, Indian River County adopted a Develop- <br />ment Order for the northern half of the transmission line in the same location <br />as approved by the Council. St. Lucie County has now brought before the Council <br />the Development Order for the southern half of the transmission line. <br />St. Lucie County Alignment <br />In response to very strong criticism from St. Lucie County property owners affected <br />by the transmission line, St. Lucie County appointed a citizens committee to work <br />with FPL on a realignment that would reduce the impact on the affected property <br />owners. The major concerns raised by the property owners appeared to be: <br />1. The impact of the transmission line on the operation of the <br />citrus groves, particularly due to the diagonal alignient <br />across the groves. <br />2. The aesthetic impact and reduction in development opportunity <br />to the property the transmission line crosses. <br />As a result of the meeting with the citizens committee, plus several public hearings <br />before the St. Lucie County Commission, the transmission line was moved out of the <br />citrus croves-Wherever possible and, when unavoidable, the line crossed at right <br />angles rather than running diagonally through the groves. To reduce the aesthetic <br />impact and loss of development opportunity in northwest St. Lucie County, the trans- <br />mission line was moved eastward to parallel the Sunshine State Parkway and cross <br />into Indian River County two miles east of the location recommended by Council. <br />Impacts of the New Alignment <br />Council staff review has identified the following impacts related to the new <br />alignment: <br />1. The realignment in St. Lucie County does not meet the line in <br />Indian River County. <br />P. The realignment creates a negative visual impact to the approx- <br />imately 12,000 vehicles that use that portion of the Sunshine <br />State Parkway each day. The realignment would parallel the <br />Parkway for approximately ten miles. <br />3. The realignment would require the crossing of approximately 3.9 <br />miles of cypress swamp. <br />4. The added length of the realignment, plus the location of part <br />of the line in a cypress swamp, will add a significant cost to <br />the line, which would be borne by the FPL customers. FPL was <br />unable, at this time, to c{liantify the added cost. <br />BJOK 41 FAH 7 7 1 <br />Mitigation of the Impacts of the New Alignment <br />The applicant, FPL, and one of the major landholders, Ashland Oil Co., are viorkinq <br />on a method to mitigate several of the negative impacts identified above. (See <br />OCT 2 41979 <br />