My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 41979 BOOK 41 FA; - <br />Exhibit 1 for location of the Ashland Oil site in relation to the transmission <br />line.) The exact terms of the mitigation efforts have not been finalized in <br />time for this staff report. However, the general idea is to restclrc the histnr-ic: <br />hydroperiods in the drained cypress swamp and provide a visual buffer for the <br />Turnpike. Staff expects to be able to present the exact mitigation measures in <br />the form of a three -party agreement at the September 21, l979 Council meeting. <br />The benefits that residents of the Treasure Coast Region ray receive from this <br />mitigation are: <br />1. There would be a tree buffer between the transmission line and the. <br />Sunshine State Parkway for several miles of their joint corridor. <br />2. The cypress Fwamp, which is now in a degraded condition due to <br />poor drainage practices, would be renourished through inr...tased <br />Crater tables. <br />3. The alignment in St. Lucie County should not be held up by lengthy, <br />expensive condemmation suit(s) and/or DRI appeals. This may well <br />redjce some of the increased costs associated with the realignment. <br />The mitigation measures envisioned by FPL and Ashland do not resolve the issue <br />of a new crossing point into Indian River County, and the resultant two mile <br />separation of the two lines. The reason the realignment turns into Indian River <br />County at this new point is to avoid a communications tower on the south side <br />of the Sunshine State Parkway (See Exhibit 2). <br />Two obvious methods of connecting the two transmission lines and missing the <br />communications tower are to either go north or south of the tower. There are <br />no overriding significant regional impacts that would support one alternate <br />over the other. Advantages and disadvantages of each are listed below: <br />Northern alignment: <br />Advantages - 1. Does not require further approvals in <br />St. Lucie County. <br />2. Does not create any "out parcels" or <br />small relatively isolated land areas. <br />Disadvantages - 1. Requires further approvals in Indian River <br />County. <br />2. Impacts a "new" property owner in Indian <br />River County. <br />3. May impact an active. osprey nest, depending <br />on exact location of realignment. <br />4. Places the line through two more miles of <br />wetlands which may require increased con- <br />struction and maintenance costs. This <br />particular wetland area is a marsh in a <br />relatively degraded condition due to local <br />drainage practices. The location of the <br />transmission line along the southern boundary <br />of this marsh should not significantly reduce <br />the existing function of this marsh. <br />Southern alignment: <br />Advantages - 1. Does not require further approval in Indian <br />River County. <br />2. Does not impact the osprey nest. <br />3. Puts the line through higher and drier land <br />which will reduce cbnstruction_and maintenance <br />costs. <br />Disadv.antages - 1. Creates a narrow "out parcel" area between the <br />line and the Sunshine State Parkway (See <br />Exhibit 2). <br />_ 2. Requires r approval in St. Lucie County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.