My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 41979 <br />BQQK 41 FAGE790 <br />It should also be noted that within the Departmental Review <br />process, that provisions can be made to insure that proposed abandon- <br />ments, etc., are considered with respect to the possibility of selling <br />these rights-of-way or easements when the added value to the <br />petitioner's property is substantial. Where two or more parties could <br />benefit, the property might be auctioned. In either case the County <br />staff, such as this Department, the Administrator's office and/or <br />others, could review and make recommendations in this regard. <br />HE WAS OF THE OPINION THAT IF WE ARE GOING TO FOLLOW OUR OLD PRO- <br />CEDURES AND NOT SELL, ETC., THERE IS A LOT OF WORK INVOLVED, AND <br />THE $100 CHARGE IS NOT TOO MUCH AND SHOULD BE STANDARDIZED FOR <br />EVERYONE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE ONLY THING THAT CAN BE <br />SOLD IS -AN EASEMENT SINCE IN AN ABANDONMENT THE PROPERTY REVERTS TO <br />THE OWNER ON EACH SIDE AS A MATTER OF LAW AND WOULD NOT BE A SALABLE <br />VALUE. THE ATTORNEY FURTHER NOTED THAT IF YOU DO SELL -ANY PROPERTY, <br />YOU HAVE TO ADVERTISE, ETC., AND HE FELT THE COMMISSION SHOULD JUST <br />REVIEW WHAT HAS TO BE DONE BY THE VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL <br />AND SEE IF THE FEE IS REASONABLE IN RELATION TO THE WORK THEY HAVE <br />TO DO. <br />SENIOR PLANNER MARSH SUGGESTED THAT ON ABANDONMENTS, $100 <br />BE CHARGED PLUS PUBLICATION COSTS. <br />FURTHER DISCUSSION ENSUED ON HOW ABANDONMENTS HISTORICALLY <br />HAVE BEEN HANDLED AND THE VARIOUS PROCEDURES REQUIRED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS RECOMMENDED THAT THERE BE TWO FEE LEVELS.- <br />AND <br />EVELS, <br />AND DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO WHETHER TO HAVE A $100 FEE AND MAKE <br />THE APPLICANT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NECESSARY ADVERTISEMENTS OR <br />WHETHER TO MAKE IT $75.00 FOR EASEMENTS AND $100 FOR ABANDONMENTS <br />PLUS ADVERTISING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHETHER THE PETITIONER IS <br />REQUIRED TO PAY FOR MAILINGS TO ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS. <br />MR. MARSH STATED THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE $100 FEE.- <br />AND <br />EE, <br />AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WOULD FORWARD NOTICES TO THE ABUTTING <br />OWNERS. <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.