My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 41979 <br />BOOK 1 Mr 1 ry <br />2 <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT IN THE PAST WE HAVE HAD THE <br />APPLICANT BEAR THE COST OF PREPARING -THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT A FORM CAN BE PREPARED AND THEN HE <br />CAN CHECK IT WHEN IT IS COMPLETED. <br />COMMISSIONER.SIEBERT DISCUSSED THE LENGTH OF THE PROCESS <br />AND ASKED IF IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE THE INFORMATION 25 DAYS BEFORE <br />IT CAN BE PUT ON THE -AGENDA. <br />MR. MARSH NOTED THAT ALL THE DIFFERENT REVIEWING AGENCIES, <br />SOUTHERN BELL, ETC,, NEED AT LEAST TWO WEEKS. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT <br />THE 25 DAYS IS THE TIME FROM THE DATE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEIVES -- <br />THE PETITION, PUTS ITS THROUGH THE REVIEW AGENCIES, MAKES COMMENTS, <br />AND.GETS IT TO. THE ADMINISTRATOR. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT WE SHOULD ESTABLISH HOW LONG <br />AFTER THAT IT GETS ON THE AGENDA. <br />THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR WAS OF THE OPINION THAT.ONCE <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR IS IN RECEIPT OF THIS MATERIAL, IT SHOULD BE PUT <br />ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING IF ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED WHETHER AN ABANDONMENT WILL BE AD- <br />VERTISED FOR HEARING BEFORE IT COMES TO THE BOARD OR WHETHER IT WILL <br />BE UP TO THE BOARD TO DECIDE IF THEY WANT TO ADVERTISE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT IS UP TO THE BOARD TO SET A POLICY. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THE ADMINISTRA- <br />TOR SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO SAY WHEN IT IS READY FOR ADVERTISEMENT <br />AND THAT WE WOULD WASTE TIME GOING THROUGH THESE MATTERS TWICE SINCE <br />WE ALMOST ALWAYS GIVE PEOPLE A PUBLIC HEARING IN ANY EVENT. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE <br />APPLICANT TO BE HEARD BY THE BOARD IF THE RECOMMENDATION IS AGAINST <br />ABANDONMENT, AND MR. NELSON STATED THAT THEY CAN RECOMMEND AGAINST <br />ABANDONMENT AND STILL GO TO A PUBLIC HEARING. HE DID NOT FEEL THAT <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO DENY A PUBLIC HEARING. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THE ADMINISTRATOR DOESN'T HAVE <br />THE AUTHORITY RIGHT NOW TO SET UP PUBLIC HEARINGS, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS STATED THAT IN THE PAST IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO THE BOARD <br />FIRST, BUT HE WOULD FEEL IF EVERYTHING IS REVIEWED AS PROPOSED, THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR COULD AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENTS AND JUST BRING THE <br />MATTER BEFORE THE BOARD THE ONE TIME. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.