My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 41979 Boos 41 FA.UF <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT THIS REPORT PRETTY WELL <br />OUTLINES THE DISCUSSION HELD WITH THE PEOPLE LISTED, BUT HE DID NOT <br />KNOW IF THIS IS THE OPINION OF THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNCIL. HE DID <br />FEEL IT WOULD BE A WORTHWHILE APPROACH TO THE SITUATION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS CONFIRMED THAT THE REPRESENTATIVE OF <br />THE CITY WAS COUNCILMAN SCURLOCK, AND HE WAS REPRESENTING HIS VIEWS, <br />NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. THE ATTORNEY NOTED <br />THAT IN THE SUMMARY WHEN HE REFERS TO THE CITY, HE ACTUALLY IS <br />REFERRING TO MR. SCURLOCK`S VIEWS. ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN REVIEWED <br />PARAGRAPH 1. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH <br />THIS PARAGRAPH. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED ABOUT THE UNINCORPORATED AREA BETWEEN <br />THE CITY AND THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS <br />NOTED THAT THIS IS COVERED IN PARAGRAPH 11, BUT HE WOULD ADD IT TO <br />PARAGRAPH 1. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED, IN REGARD TO PARAGRAPH 2, THAT <br />ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THE CITY'S CHANGE OF ATTITUDE IS THAT THEY <br />HAVE DISCOVERED THEY HAVE A VASTLY EXPANDED WATER SUPPLY THAN PRE- <br />VIOUSLY ANTICIPATED. HE STATED THAT THE CITY IS CONCERNED ABOUT <br />THEIR ABILITY TO SUPPLY SEWER AND INDICATED A CLEAR INTENT NOT TO BE <br />PLACED IN A POSITION WHERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO EXPAND THEIR SEWER <br />TREATMENT PLANT BEYOND ITS CURRENT CAPACITY OF 4.5 M.G.D. THE <br />ATTORNEY DISCUSSED THE 1.8 M.G.D. (THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AMOUNT <br />CURRENTLY TREATED BY THE CITY AND THEIR MAXIMUM CAPACITY) AND STATED <br />THAT THE CITY APPARENTLY IS WILLING TO MAKE THIS SURPLUS AVAILABLE <br />TO BOTH THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND THE COUNTY. HE NOTED <br />THAT MR. SCURLOCK TALKED IN TERMS OF SETTING A LIMIT, I.E. WITHIN <br />10% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED WHETHER THE CITY ALSO SERVES SEWER <br />IN ALL THE SQUARED OFF AREAS WE TALKED ABOUT, <br />ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT THEY DO NOT, BUT THESE ARE <br />JUST ISOLATED PLACES WHICH INVOLVE VERY LITTLE IN QUANTITY, AND HE <br />DID NOT SEE ANY PROBLEM BETWEEN EITHER GIVING THEM UP OR ACCEPTING <br />THEM. <br />54 <br />_I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.