10/24/1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT IS THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES NOT TO PUT EITHER IN THE POSITION OF SERVING SEWER AND NOT WATER OR VICE VERSA, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE THE SAME UNDERSTANDING ABOUT 6TH AVENUE AND FELT THE CITY DID NOT WANT TO SEE ANYONE ELSE HOOKED UP ON IT. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAD IN- FORMED THEM THAT WE WERE MORALLY OBLIGATED ON SOME OF IT BECAUSE MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ALREADY WAS ANTICIPATED, AND THEY SAID THEY UNDERSTOOD BUT THAT THEY DID NOT WANT ANYONE ELSE HOOKED UP ON IT. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE GOT THE IMPRESSION THAT WE HAD A CERTAIN AMOUNT TO USE THAT WAS LEFT AND WE COULD USE IT AS WE SAW FIT. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT POSSIBLY WE ARE ENTITLED T0, BUT HE WOULD HATE TO SEE US USE IT UP. HE NOTED THAT WE DON'T WANT WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS, AND THEY DONT WANT WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT THERE ARE SOME SITUATIONS THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY WHAT ANYONE WANTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT CITY ATTORNEY PALMER CALLED HIM THIS MORNING, AND HIS PRIME CONCERN WAS THIS ISSUE. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE CITY RECOGNIZES THAT WE HAVE MADE SOME COMMITMENTS IN THE 6TH AVENUE AREA THAT WILL BE HONORED. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES APPARENTLY HAS PLANS LARGER THAN ANTICIPATED BY THEIR FASTER PLAN BECAUSE THEY HAVE ASKED US FOR SEWER ALLOCATION IN EX- CESS OF THEIR PRESENT ZONING AND MASTER PLAN CONFIGURATIONS. PE FELT IF THERE IS GOING TO BE A LIMITATION ON US, THERE SHOULD BE A LIMITATION ON INDIAN RIVER SHORES ALSO. ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT THE CITY SAYS THEY WILL SERVE INDIAN RIVER SHORES AS LONG AS THEY HAVE THE CAPACITY T0, AND IT COMES OUT OF THE 1.8 M.G.D. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE 1..5 M.G.D. IS SHARED BETWEEN THE TOWN AND THE COUNTY, DO WE ASSUME THE TOWN WILL COME TO THE COUNTY FOR THEIR ALLOCATION OR ARE WE COMPETING AGAINST THEM? 55 OCT 2 4197'9 BOOK ql FACE 801