My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 41979 BOOK 41 NEF813 <br />COMMISSIONER LOY BROUGHT TO THE BOARD'S ATTENTION THE <br />BEACH LOTS WE ASSISTED THE CITY OF VERO BEACH IN PURCHASING, SOME <br />YEARS AGO. SHE NOTED THAT THE CITY IS NOW GETTING READY TO DEVELOP <br />THESE LOTS AND HAS A PROBLEM WITH THE OFFICIAL DEED. THEY NEED <br />OUR HELP BECAUSE WE REQUIRED THAT WE HAVE A 2/5 INTEREST IN EACH LOT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY IS PREPARING TO <br />QUIT CLAIM TO THE COUNTY BY CORRECTIVE QUIT CLAIM DEED OUR 2/5 <br />INTEREST, AND THE COUNTY NEEDS TO ACCEPT THIS QUIT CLAIM, WHICH NOW <br />SETS OUT THAT THE PROPERTY IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR PUBLIC RECREATIONAL <br />PURPOSES. THIS WORDING IS NECESSARY TO MEET THE STATES REQUIRE- <br />MENTS AND OBTAIN THE GRANT FUNDING. THE ORIGINAL DEEDS THAT CREATED <br />THE 2/5 AND 3/5 INTEREST DID NOT SET OUT THAT THE PROPERTY COULD <br />ONLY BE USED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER SOY, TO ACCEPT THE CORRECTIVE QUIT CLAIM FROM THE CITY <br />OF VERO BEACH AS DESCRIBED ABOVE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS <br />PROPERTY IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR PUBLIC RECREATIONAL PURPOSES. <br />COMMISSIONER SOY ASKED IF WE COULD ADD TO THE MOTION <br />SOMETHING STATING THAT FOR ALL RECREATIONAL PURPOSES, THIS WOULD BE <br />OPEN AND FREE TO THE PUBLIC. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THERE MIGHT WELL BE A TIME WHEN <br />THE CITY WOULD WANT TO CHARGE FOR PARKING IN ORDER TO PAY FOR PATROLING <br />OF THE BEACH, ETC, <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE DID NOT WANT ANY CHARGE <br />MADE FOR USE OF THE BEACH. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT IF ANY REVENUE WERE <br />DERIVED, IT WOULD BE STRICTLY FOR MAINTENANCE AND BETTERMENT OF THE <br />FACILITY. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT WE MIGHT SAY ACCESS TO <br />THE FACILITIES WILL ALWAYS BE OPEN WITHOUT ANY CHARGE, I.E. - NO <br />ADMISSION FEE. HE ASKED IF WE COULD AGREE THAT ANY FEES OR CHARGES <br />MUST BE AGREED UPON BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, <br />� 67® � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.