Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED SAYING "CHARGES FOR USE <br />OF THE FACILITIES WOULD BE DETERMINED WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF BOTH <br />PARTIES HOLDING AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST it <br />THE BOARD CONTINUED TO DISCUSS VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES, AND <br />THE POSSIBILITY OF A HOT DOG STAND OR SOMETHING OF THE SORT WAS <br />MENTIONED. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY REITERATED THAT SHE JUST WISHED TO <br />EMPHASIZE THAT IT IS TO BE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS QUIT CLAIM <br />IS AN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WITH MAYOR SMITHS NAME ON IT, AND HE FELT <br />HE SHOULD APPROACH THE CITY AND GET THEIR CONCURRENCE BEFORE ADDING <br />ANY PROVISION. HE STATED THAT HIS UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE BOARD <br />HAS NO OBJECTION TO A PARKING CHARGE, BUT DID NOT WANT ANY SORT OF <br />AN ADMISSION CHARGE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TO <br />CONCUR WITH ANY PARKING CHARGE ALSO. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS MOTION FOR PURPOSES OF <br />REWORDING, AND COMMISSIONER Loy WITHDREW HER SECOND. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ACCEPT THE CORRECTIVE <br />QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM THE CITY OF VERO BEACH RE THE BEACHFRONT PROPERTY <br />WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR PUBLIC RECREA- <br />TIONAL PURPOSES AND THAT IT SHALL BE WITHOUT CHARGES OF ANY KIND <br />WITHOUT FUTURE CONCURRENCE OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION. <br />OCT 2 4 1979 BOOK 41 <br />68 PACE814 <br />.�. <br />L- <br />