My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/5/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
04/5/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2018 12:18:37 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 5:59:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC / SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/05/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3001
Book and Page
128, 612-647
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
237
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />including $14,148.36 for labor and $6,537.39 for <br />County-purchased materials; approved Work <br />Authorization No. 2005-002 to the Labor Contractor, The <br />Danella Companies, Inc., in form; and authorized the <br />Chairman to sign same upon receipt of the executed labor <br />contract, as recommended in the memorandum of March <br />24, 2005. <br /> <br />WORK AUTHORIZATION DIRECTIVE IS ON FILE <br />IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br /> <br />13.D. COMMISSIONER WESLEY S. DAVIS – PRIORITIZE ROAD <br />PROJECTS <br />Commissioner Davis was concerned about road projects in the north county keeping <br />up with the developments. He was especially concerned about the capacity of the bridges in that <br />area and was not sure we could wait 5 years to bring the bridges up to handle the volume. <br />A lengthy and detailed question and answer period followed during which Public <br />Works Director Jim Davis and Community Development Director Bob Keating reported on our <br />bridge replacement program and reasoning, bridges anticipated, bridges in process, status of <br />bridges, bridges completed, changes that had been made to the LDRs in 1992, anticipated <br />amendments to the LDRs, actual processes that must occur, delays caused by rights-of-way <br />acquisitions, necessity for individualized architectural plans for bridges, need for elevation of the <br />new bridges, anticipated bridge costs, concurrency tests, traffic modeling for future needs and <br />other pertinent factors and regulations involved in road-building. <br />In response to Commissioner Davis’ questions regarding costs and budgets, Director <br />Davis detailed costs for construction for roads and bridges. Director Davis also noted that <br />right-of-way acquisition can be emotional for the property owners and for that reason the County <br />has tried to work with them in order to avoid eminent domain. <br />April 5, 2005 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.