My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/06/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
04/06/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:24:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/06/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2927
Book and Page
126, 767-818
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
417
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Neuberger, the Board adopted <br />Resolution 2004-036, approving Traffic Control <br />Devices authorized by the Director of Public Works. <br /> <br />7.X. R--WA–NC33 <br />RD <br />IGHTOFAY CQUISITION ORTHWEST ORNER OF <br />S66A–FH.PEP. <br />TH <br />TREET AND VENUE RED ETERSON AND DWARD <br />P–P’G&N,I. <br />ETERSON ETERSONS ROVES URSERY NC <br /> <br />(CLERK’S NOTE <br />: This item was heard following Item 7.T. and is placed here for <br />continuity.) <br /> <br />Chairman Ginn said she is concerned that the County is paying for road expansions <br />to meet the needs of the developers. She feels the Board should insist that the developers pay for <br />road expansion. <br />County Engineer Chris Kafer said the original developer’s agreement approved in <br />rd <br />March 2003 specifically states that the County would purchase the right-of-way for 33 Street. <br />Amendment 1 to the Developer’s Agreement that was approved July 29, 2003 required the <br />developer to pay $50,000 or approximately ¼ of the estimated cost of the design and construction. <br />Discussion ensued by the Board and they learned the reason for purchase of this <br />right-of-way is to make improvements to meet the minimum standards. It is not necessary for the <br />developer’s access, but it is the County’s objective to meet certain requirements in the LDRs to <br />obtain equal participation in the improvements. Chairman Ginn then concluded that this needed to <br />be addressed with the Growth Task Force. <br /> <br />APRIL 6, 2004 <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.