My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/7/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
11/7/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:11:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/07/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE STREET NUMBERING SYSTEM <br />IN SUMMERPLACE, AS PRESENTED IN SENIOR PLANNER MARSH'S FOLLOWING <br />MEMORANDUM: <br />DEPARTMENT <br />October 29, 1979 <br />MEM0 <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: 7:3avid Marsh, Senior Planner <br />SUBJECT: Street Numbering System - Summerplace <br />At the request of Neil Nelson and several of the Board members, we have <br />developed the following summary of the street numbering problem in the <br />Summerplace Subdivision. This situation came to our attention approxi- <br />mately three weeks ago when a Mr. Steven J. Kubina, a resident in that sub- <br />division, submitted that many of the house numbers in the area were incorrect. <br />This staff then followed up and determined that Mr. Kubina was correct in <br />that the numbers assigned to houses on streets running generally west to east <br />were in ascending rather than descending order. The mistake appears to have <br />been made several years ago when a former member of this staff went through <br />the entire subdivision assigning numbers in order to speed up the process <br />when addresses are requested (this is a standard procedure when work loads <br />allow the responsible staff member this opportunity). Simply put, however, <br />it has been determined that the numbering was incorrectly done (probably <br />shortly after the numbering system was implemented), and this problem has <br />carried through without anyone noticing the discrepancy until now. <br />Thus we are faced with the prospect of trying to rectify this error or, <br />coming up with some type of solution. One of the considerations which this <br />staff feels is very important in this regard is the extent of the problem. <br />The following table shows the estimated number of houses where new numbers <br />will need to be assigned if the problem is corrected. <br />Summerplace Subdivision - Units 1 - 4: <br />Estimated number houses which would be affected - 77 <br />Number houses with addresses posted - 44 <br />Number houses without addresses posted - 33 <br />Estimated number of remaining lots which would <br />be affected - 60 - 70 <br />(An estimated 20 - 25% of these houses are not <br />resided in at present) <br />After researching this situation, we then contacted both emergency service <br />and utility providers to determine what type of operational impacts had been <br />experienced (or were anticipated) with the current system. In all cases, it <br />was indicated that although the system was incorrect, it had not created any <br />DAVIO M. REVER • DIRECTOR <br />14"' AVE. VERO BEACH, FLc3296O • 005/567-514 <br />NOV - 7,979 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.