Laserfiche WebLink
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR RELSON-COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD <br />LIKE TO SEE THE COUNTY UTILIZE THIS POLICY OF HAVING CONSULTANTS <br />.FURNISH A FEE PROPOSAL. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT OTHER COUNTIES ARE SENDING <br />OUT NOTICES TO THE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS, AND THEY ARE SENDING <br />BACK INDICATIONS OF INTEREST; THEN OUT OF THE*TOP THREE CONSULTANTS <br />SELECTED, THEY ARE ASKED TO SUBMIT THEIR SCOPE OF WORK ALONG WITH <br />THE DOLLAR AMOUNT TO DO THIS WORK. HE CONTINUED THAT THE FIRMS <br />CAN REFUSE TO SUBMIT THIS DOLLAR AMOUNT INFORMATION. ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE DOT HAD FOLLOWED THIS POLICY AND <br />INCLUDED IT IN AN APPROPRIATION BILL, BUT A JUDGE RULED IT UNLAWFUL <br />BECAUSE IT WAS TIED TO AN APPROPRIATION BILL. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT A SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THREE <br />OR FIVE MEN, APPOINTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR, COULD DO THE SCREENING <br />OF THE CONSULTANTS AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD, AND IN <br />THAT WAY, THE BOARD WOULD NOT HAVE TO SPEND A GREAT DEAL OF TIME <br />GOING THROUGH THE INTERVIEWS. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THIS IS A MORE PROFESSIONAL MANNER <br />OF SELECTING A CONSULTANT. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO <br />WORK ON IMPLEMENTING A CONSULTANT SELECTION PLAN AND PRESENT IT <br />AT THE NEXT MEETING. <br />NOV 7 1979 65 BOOK 4.2 PAGE 65 <br />