My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/21/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
11/21/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:13:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE COMMENTS WITH HIM AND RETURN TO THE MEETING AT 3:00 O'CLOCK <br />P.M. TO GIVE A SUMMATION. <br />MR. KONTOULAS STRESSED THE TIME ELEMENT AND SAID THE <br />CONSULTANTS HAVE ABOUT A WEEK OR SO TO GO OVER HIS COMMENTS AND <br />MAKE CORRECTIONS. HE BRIEFLY GAVE SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF HIS <br />CONCERN; SUCH AS: AtKING THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE <br />JOB DRAWINGS; FINDING SEVERAL AREAS OF REPETITION IN THE TWO <br />PROJECTS; FINDING 50 PAGES OF SPECIFICATIONS OF CHILLERS AND <br />BOILERS THAT DO NOT BELONG IN THE COURTHOUSE PROJECT; SELECTING <br />COLORS OF CERAMIC TILE AND PANELING; AND BEING TOLD TO STOP <br />SALVAGING ANY COPPER FROM THE PROJECT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING <br />TO ACCEPT MR. KONTOULAS' EVALUATION OF THE SUBJECT. <br />MR. KONTOULAS NOTED THAT IT WOULD PROBABLY UPSET THE <br />ARCHITECTS WHEN THEY SEE THE 48 PAGES OF COMMENTS, BUT THE MAIN <br />THING IS THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO HOLD TO THE SCHEDULE PROCEDURE. <br />HE THEN DISCUSSED WHETHER OR NOT THERE SHOULD BE ONE OR TWO <br />PROJECTS. MR. KONTOULAS DOES SEE SOME COMPLICATIONS BECAUSE IN <br />THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE IS SUPPOSED TO <br />COORDINATE ALL WORK. THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH HAVING TO MOVE <br />SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS IN ORDER TO START WORKING UPSTAIRS IN THE <br />COURTHOUSE. <br />!DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE COUNTY <br />WOULD HAVE TO FIND SOME WAY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE <br />TO BE MOVED. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT IT SHOULD BE MADE <br />KNOWN TO THE BIDDERS THAT WE WILL BE UNABLE TO MOVE FROM THE <br />COURTHOUSE UNTIL IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, BECAUSE THERE IS <br />NO OTHER PLACE FOR THESE OFFICES TO GO. HE CONTINUED THAT WHETHER <br />IT IS ONE OR TWO CONTRACTS, WE CANNOT MOVE OUT UNTIL THE OTHER <br />BUILDING IS READY. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY CHANCE THAT <br />WE COULD USE SOME TURN -AROUND SPACE IN THE HOSPITAL FOR THE PEOPLE <br />THAT HAVE TO BE MOVED OUT OF THE COURTHOUSE. <br />NOV 211979 27 Book p4a,1241- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.