11/21/1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

THE COMMENTS WITH HIM AND RETURN TO THE MEETING AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. TO GIVE A SUMMATION. MR. KONTOULAS STRESSED THE TIME ELEMENT AND SAID THE CONSULTANTS HAVE ABOUT A WEEK OR SO TO GO OVER HIS COMMENTS AND MAKE CORRECTIONS. HE BRIEFLY GAVE SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF HIS CONCERN; SUCH AS: AtKING THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE JOB DRAWINGS; FINDING SEVERAL AREAS OF REPETITION IN THE TWO PROJECTS; FINDING 50 PAGES OF SPECIFICATIONS OF CHILLERS AND BOILERS THAT DO NOT BELONG IN THE COURTHOUSE PROJECT; SELECTING COLORS OF CERAMIC TILE AND PANELING; AND BEING TOLD TO STOP SALVAGING ANY COPPER FROM THE PROJECT. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING TO ACCEPT MR. KONTOULAS' EVALUATION OF THE SUBJECT. MR. KONTOULAS NOTED THAT IT WOULD PROBABLY UPSET THE ARCHITECTS WHEN THEY SEE THE 48 PAGES OF COMMENTS, BUT THE MAIN THING IS THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO HOLD TO THE SCHEDULE PROCEDURE. HE THEN DISCUSSED WHETHER OR NOT THERE SHOULD BE ONE OR TWO PROJECTS. MR. KONTOULAS DOES SEE SOME COMPLICATIONS BECAUSE IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE IS SUPPOSED TO COORDINATE ALL WORK. THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH HAVING TO MOVE SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS IN ORDER TO START WORKING UPSTAIRS IN THE COURTHOUSE. !DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE TO FIND SOME WAY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE TO BE MOVED. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT IT SHOULD BE MADE KNOWN TO THE BIDDERS THAT WE WILL BE UNABLE TO MOVE FROM THE COURTHOUSE UNTIL IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER PLACE FOR THESE OFFICES TO GO. HE CONTINUED THAT WHETHER IT IS ONE OR TWO CONTRACTS, WE CANNOT MOVE OUT UNTIL THE OTHER BUILDING IS READY. COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY CHANCE THAT WE COULD USE SOME TURN -AROUND SPACE IN THE HOSPITAL FOR THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE TO BE MOVED OUT OF THE COURTHOUSE. NOV 211979 27 Book p4a,1241-