My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
12/5/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:14:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F"_ <br />DEC 51979 <br />BOOK <br />42 <br />PAGE 196 <br />i <br />THERE IS NO <br />GUARANTEE THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION <br />WILL <br />GIVE <br />THEIR APPROVAL, AND THERE IS A RISK INVOLVED. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT WE COULD INCLUDE SOME <br />LANGUAGE REQUIRING THAT THE LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPROVE THE PLANS <br />AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND IF THERE ARE ANY MAJOR MODIFICATIONS, THEY <br />WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEM. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AND MR. KONTOULAS AGREED THIS WAS A GOOD <br />IDEA. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE ADDENDUM WOULD HAVE TO <br />BE BID SEPARATELY, AND MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT AN ADDENDUM CAN BE <br />INSERTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS AT A LATER DATE. USUALLY IT IS <br />HANDLED BEFORE THE BIDS ARE RECEIVED, AND THESE ADDS OR DEDUCTS ARE <br />INCLUDED IN THE BID. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS DECIDED THAT JANUARY LITH <br />SHOULD BE THE DEADLINE FOR GETTING ADDENDUMS AND A DECISION OF THE <br />SCHOOL BOARD. <br />WILLIAM KOOLAGE, INTERESTED CITIZEN, ASKED IF THE BOARD <br />HAS ARRIVED AT A LEASE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD ON THE SAME BASIS AS <br />OTHER DEPARTMENTS, OR IS IT MORE FAVORABLE TO THEM WITH THE COUNTY <br />PICKING UP SOME OF THE COSTS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THERE COULD WELL BE.SOME DISTINCTION <br />BETWEEN THE LEASES, AND THE CHAIRMAN POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE LEASING <br />THE SCHOOL DISTRICT 26,000 SQ. FT. WHILE ONLY 1,600 SQ. FT. TO THE <br />STATE DIVISION OF LICENSING, FOR INSTANCE. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE INSERTED SOME LANGUAGE <br />TO TAKE CARE OF MAJOR REPAIR, BUT BASICALLY IT IS A 30 -YEAR LEASE AT <br />A SET ANNUAL AMOUNT, WHICH IS BASICALLY OUR COST WITH A 10% CON- <br />TINGENCY AND AN ESTIMATED INTEREST FIGURE FROM THE BONDING PEOPLE <br />OF ABOUT 5-1/4%. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER THE INTEREST <br />RATE WENT UP BECAUSE WE WENT TO 30 YEARS INSTEAD OF 20, AND MR. <br />THOMAS FELT THERE WOULD BE.A VERY FRACTIONAL CHANGE UNTIL YOU GOT <br />PAST 30 YEARS. THE BOARD THEN WENT INTO A TECHNICAL DISCUSSION OF <br />COLLATERALIZATION, AMORTIZATION, ETC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.