My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
12/5/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:14:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ENG CONTINUED THAT THE REVISED CONSTRUCTION COST IS $4,764,000, <br />AND THE FOLLOWING PAGE SHOWS THE TOTAL COST OF THE SYSTEM IMPROVE- <br />MENT. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAD A 20% ESCALATION FACTOR, BUT FELT THEY <br />COULD LIVE WITH 15%. THE TOTAL ESTIMATE IS $6,600,000, AND THE ANNUAL <br />EXPENSE WHICH THE SYSTEM HAS TO GENERATE TO BE SELF SUFFICIENT IS <br />IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF•$677,495. MR. ENG REPORTED THAT WE HAD 2,500 <br />CONNECTIONS.AVAILABLE; THEY WENT BACK AND INVENTORIED, AND WITH <br />VISTA PROPERTIES AND CUSTOMER SERVICE, FOUND THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY <br />600 ADDITIONAL AVAILABLE AT THE PRESENT TIME. MR. ENG THEN DISCUSSED <br />THE RECORD OF WATER CONSUMPTION IN THE GIFFORD AREA AND IN THE MID <br />FLORIDA, WHICH WAS USED TO COME UP WITH AN AVERAGE OF 71000 GALLONS <br />PER MONTH PER RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION. HE NOTED THAT TABLE II TOOK <br />THE ACTUAL CONNECTIONS THAT ARE AVAILABLE AND PROPOSED A RATE SCHEDULE <br />WITH THE BASE RATE IDENTICAL TO THE NORTH COUNTY-GIFFORD RATE. HE <br />THEN DISCUSSED THE CHARGES FOR THE VARIOUS USERS. MR. ENG REVIEWED <br />TABLE III AND EXPLAINED HOW THEY COMPUTED THE MONTHLY REVENUE SCHEDULE <br />OF $46,000, NOTING THAT RESIDENTIAL GENERATES 80% OF THE TOTAL. <br />THE TOTAL ESTIMATED YEARLY REVENUE IS ABOUT $555,000 OR A DEFICIT <br />OF $122,000 ANNUALLY. MR. ENG CONTINUED THAT THE MOST PROMISING <br />ALTERNATIVE TO MAKE UP THIS DEFICIT, AS DISCUSSED WITH FMHA, WOULD <br />BE A UTILITY TAX, AND SUCH A TAX WOULD WORK OUT TO ABOUT $3.50 PER <br />MONTH PER CONNECTION. HE STATED THAT IF THE COUNTY IS WILLING TO <br />IMPOSE A UTILITY TAX AT THIS TIME, THEY CAN PROCEED WITH THE APPLICA- <br />TION CONFERENCE AND HAVE A LETTER OF CONDITION ISSUED BASED ON THESE <br />RATES AND A UTILITY TAX. MR. ENG CONTINUED THAT BEFORE THE BONDS <br />ARE VALIDATED, ABOUT 10 MONTHS FROM NOW, IF ADDITIONAL CONNECTIONS <br />BECOME AVAILABLE, THEY CAN BE UTILIZED TO AMORTIZE THE PROJECT AND <br />THIS CAN BE ADJUSTED BEFORE THE BOND CLOSING. IF ANOTHER 690 <br />CONNECTIONS CAN BE GENERATED BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, A UTILITY TAX <br />WILL NOT BE NECESSARY, BUT FMHA HAS TO HAVE SOMETHING CONCRETE IN <br />ORDER TO PROCEED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT IF WE HAVE TO BE SURE ABOUT <br />CONNECTIONS, IT WILL HAVE TO BE MANDATORY HOOK-UP AND MR. ENG AGREED. <br />39 <br />DEC 51979 BOOK 42 FACE 217 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.