My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/02/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
05/02/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:11:50 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/02/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3098
Book and Page
130, 611-675
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
302
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />County Administrator Baird understood that anytime roads need widening, property <br />owners will be affected, and it is an emotional issue. The Board has directed staff to get roads and <br />bridges built and to fast-track the work. <br />th <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis commented that the 74 Avenue corridor is unique <br />because it is the boundary between IRFWCD and the Sebastian River Drainage District. The <br />th <br />rights-of-way do not line up from the east side of 74 Avenue to the west side. It would be very <br />th <br />difficult to get continuity on the east-west roads for the 74 Avenue corridor. Also, Range Line <br />th <br />Canal on the east side of 74 Avenue is very large and that would necessitate bridges at every <br />th <br />east-west location. The 26 Street bridge is the only bridge and it was just recently built. The <br />th <br />per-bridge cost would be from $1.3 to $1.5 million. He believed 66 Avenue to be the only <br />economically viable corridor to provide additional north-south capacity that would give good <br />continuity to serve Sebastian to Oslo Road. <br />th <br />Glenn Legwen <br />, 5900 5 Street SW, commented on the current high cost of gasoline and <br />of building roads and suggested the Board needed to look at economically increasing public <br />transportation and make it enjoyable with convenient routes at reduced rates. <br />thth <br />Dian S. George <br />, 27 Avenue, thought widening 66 Avenue has everything to do with <br />Mark Brackett’s Liberty Park project and that there were other alternatives. <br /> <br />There were no additional speakers and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bowden voiced her opposition to 6-laning Indian River Boulevard. She <br />did not want “an I-95” road on Indian River Boulevard. <br /> <br />Chairman Neuberger asked for a motion; there was no response. <br /> <br />th <br />Commissioner Davis asked again if there was any other way to meet concurrency on 66 <br />Avenue. <br />May 2, 2006 <br />29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.