My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/02/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
05/02/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:11:50 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/02/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3098
Book and Page
130, 611-675
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
302
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />thrd <br />roadway to satisfy the needs of all the residents. He commented that the residents on 27 and 43 <br />Avenues should have known years ago the roads would need to be widened. <br />Renee Renzi <br />, Waverly Place, commented that Indian River Boulevard, outside of city <br />limits, is straggly and needs to be maintained. <br />To that comment, Commissioner Davis added that CR 512 inside city limits of Sebastian <br />was similar to that. <br />County Administrator Baird reminded that landscaping would be an on-going expense to <br />maintain. <br />stthrd <br />George Sigler <br />, 155 31 Avenue SW, between 27 & 43 Avenues, applauded the <br />design. He preferred Option 2 and, regarding the landscaping, he suggested that we should find <br />Mr. Sigler <br />out what grows and requires the least maintenance. and Vice Chairman Wheeler <br />discussed opinions about odors from the Landfill and their prospects of development regarding the <br />possible interchange at Oslo Road and I-95. <br />th <br />Ruth Stanbridge <br />, 4835 66 Avenue, predicted there would be flaws in the 2030 plan. <br />She commented that it seemed that all the concurrency was being placed on one “super highway <br />th <br />called 66 Avenue”. She claimed the County would be wiping out homes, businesses, pastures, <br />etcetera of people who have lived there for many years, for future residents who may or may not <br />th <br />come. On May 24 there will be a public workshop but the public would not be able to voice their <br />opinions and they should have that opportunity in a public hearing before all of the <br />th <br />Commissioners. She asked if the real plan for the widening of 66 Avenue was to move the urban <br />service area boundary or to plan for new towns, then the people, taxpayers, and homeowners <br />should be told. <br />Vice Chairman Wheeler responded that there is no intent on his part to move the USA. <br />Commissioner Davis asked if there was any way of meeting concurrency without <br />th <br />widening 66 Avenue. <br />Community Development Director Keating responded by pointing out that the roads <br />have been in the long range transportation plan for many years. He supported his staff for devising <br />the best set of possibilities to meet County needs in 2030. <br />May 2, 2006 <br />28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.