Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THEY -HAD ANY PROJECTS GOING <br />NOW IN THE SAME DER DISTRICT, AND MR. HANCOCK ADVISED NEGATIVELY, <br />AS THEIR WORK WAS BEING FARMED DOWN FROM THEIR REGIONAL OFFICE IN <br />VIRGINIA. <br />MR. BLACKWELL INTERJECTED THAT THEY HAVE EXPERIENCE IN <br />DEALING WITH THE COAST GUARD, THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS, AND THE FISH <br />AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED HOW THEIR FIRM WOULD PROPOSE <br />PAYMENT ON THEIR PROJECT. <br />MR. BLACKWELL COMMENTED THAT COST PLUS FIXED FEE IS USUAL, <br />OR A LUMP SUM BASIS. <br />MR. HANCOCK REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE HAD NO LOCAL EXPERIENCE <br />WITH DRAINAGE PROBLEMS BUT DO UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEMS OF DRAINAGE, <br />AND THE DER REQUIREMENTS. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STRESSED THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM THEY ARE <br />ANTICIPATING WITH THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN THAT AREA, AND THE BOARD <br />IS CONCERNED THAT WE HAVE SOMEBODY WITH THE ABILITY TO CARRY THE <br />PROJECT THROUGH THE PERMITTING STAGE. <br />MR. HANCOCK FELT THAT IF THE DER IS BROUGHT INTO THE PROJECT <br />RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING AND WORK WITH THEM, -THEY CAN PROBABLY DO A <br />LOT MORE THAN TRYING TO PROVE TO THE DER THAT SOMETHING WILL WORK. <br />HE STATED THAT HE WOULD TRY TO SATISFY EVERY CONDITION THE DER HAD <br />ON THE PROJECT. <br />THE BOARD THEN THANKED THE GENTLEMEN FOR THEIR PRESENTATION. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING THE INTERVIEWS, AND IT WAS <br />DECIDED TO MAKE A FORMAL SELECTION AT THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 19, <br />1979. <br />THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED <br />AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:25 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />ATTEST: <br />�} e <br />o� r <br />CLERK CHAIRMAN <br />DEC 121979 11 aoox 42 PAGE 304 <br />