My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
12/19/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:17:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />DEC 19 197BOOK �Z PAGE340 <br />MR. SWENSON STATED THERE ARE 36 LOTS AFFECTED BY THE PRO- <br />POSED LANDSCAPING OF WHICH THE COMPANY OWNS 13. OF THE REMAINING, <br />4 ARE UNIMPROVED AND 19 ARE DEVELOPED. <br />COMMISSIONER SOY FELT THEY COULD OBTAIN A PLANTING EASEMENT <br />FROM THESE HOMEOWNERS, BUT MR. SWENSON STATED THAT THERE IS VERY <br />LITTLE SPACE BETWEEN THEIR FRONT DOORS AND THE STREET AND GOING INTO <br />IT FURTHER WOULD SHRINK THEIR YARDS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED WHY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF <br />1,100 LOTS IS NOT A DRI, AND MR. REVER STATED THAT IT IS BECAUSE GDC <br />ALREADY HAS A VESTED INTEREST.AND WAS APPROVED. THERE ISN'T ENOUGH <br />OF THE NON -VESTED PROPERTY TO PUT IT OVER THE THRESHOLD. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS THEN DISCUSSED DENSITY AND CONTINUED TO <br />EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT THE TRAFFIC PATTERN RESULTING FROM SUCH A LARGE <br />DEVELOPMENT. HE STATED THAT HE IS NOT IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT, <br />BUT JUST WANTS TO BE REALISTIC ABOUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN AT U.S. 1. HE <br />FELT WE SHOULD FACE THIS PROBLEM AND DEAL WITH IT NOW. <br />COMMISSIONER SOY INFORMED MR. SWENSON THAT WE HAVE A <br />PROBLEM IN THAT WE HAVE AN EXTREMELY LONG AGENDA TODAY AND MUST PROCEED. <br />MR. SWENSON STATED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED WITH THEIR DEVELOP- <br />MENT PLAN AND IF THE BOARD DESIRED, THEY WOULD BE GLAD TO REDRAW THE <br />LANDSCAPING PLAN. THE BUILDING IS NOT AT ISSUE, STRICTLY THE PAVING. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT THEY WILL NEED 5' FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON EACH <br />SIDE OF THE STREET AS THE ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM, AND HE BELIEVED THE RIGHT- <br />OF-WAY IS 20', <br />COMMISSIONER SOY STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT ABOUT TO APPROVE <br />ANYTHING TODAY BASED ON SOMETHING VAGUE AND INDEFINITE. SHE AGREED <br />THAT CONCEPTUALLY IT LOOKS PRETTY, BUT WE NEED SOMETHING EXACT. <br />MR. SWENSON ASKED IF THE BOARD FELT THIS CONCEPT WAS A <br />REASONABLE APPROACH IF MAINTENANCE CAN BE ASSURED AND IF THEY HAVE <br />VERY SPECIFIC DRAWINGS, AND THE BOARD AGREED THEY DID. <br />THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK <br />READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: <br />O 36 = <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.