My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
12/19/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:17:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC 191979 Bom 42 PAGE 388 <br />THE PROPER SQUARE FOOTAGE, ETC., AND WOULD JUST SELL HALF THE LOTS. <br />HE WISHED TO KNOW IF THEY CAN DO THAT WITHOUT RESUBDIVIDING. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT WE ARE HERE TODAY TO DISCUSS <br />DIVIDING LOTS #1 AND #7 AND HE DID NOT THINK THE BOARD IS GOING TO <br />GET INTO THE QUESTION OF RESUBDIVIDING TODAY, <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT THIS MATTER SHOULD BE REFERRED TO <br />THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND FELT IT PROBABLY WOULD CALL FOR A REPLAT. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT MR. ZORC WITHDRAW THE <br />MATTER, AND HE STATED THAT HE STILL WANTED TO DISCUSS LOTS #1 AND G. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED WHAT PROPOSAL MR. ZORC HAD WITH <br />REGARD TO SPLITTING LOTS #1 AND G, AND MR. ZORC STATED THEY WOULD <br />BE SPLIT EAST AND WEST AND THEY WOULD BE ACCESSED PARTLY OFF 6TH <br />AVENUE. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE DEFINITELY WAS NOT IN FAVOR <br />OF ANY MORE DIRECT ACCESS ONTO 6TH AVENUE. <br />13TH ST. <br />MR. ZORC FELT THESE LOTS COULD ACCESS ONTO 14TH ST. OR <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER HAS TALKED TO MR. ZORC ABOUT ACCESS AND HAS <br />RESERVATIONS CONCERNING IT. MR. NELSON DID NOT BELIEVE THAT PLANNING <br />HAS HAD A CHANCE TO STUDY THIS, AND THEY HAVE MADE NO WRITTEN RECOM- <br />MENDATIONS. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED, AND THE BOARD FELT POSSIBLY ALL THESE <br />QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT ONE TIME, BUT MR. ZORC STATED THAT <br />HE HAD HOPED THAT SPLITTING THE LOTS WOULD NOT REQUIRE A REPLAT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT MR. ZORC IS CORRECT AS TO LOTS <br />#1 AN #Z; OUR ORDINANCE SIMPLY SAYS THAT HE CANT DIVIDE'THEM WITHOUT <br />THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION. <br />MR, ZORC UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING <br />AND NOTED THAT IF YOU FILE A REPLAT, IT DOESNIT REQUIRE A HEARING. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO REPLAT, <br />THE ORDINANCE WE ARE DISCUSSING DOES NOT COME INTO EFFECT, AND SENIOR <br />PLANNER MARSH AGREED THAT MR. ZORC WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH <br />THE WHOLE SUBDIVISION PROCESS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.