My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/03/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
05/03/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:19:29 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/03/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3098
Book and Page
130, 676-687
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
304
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Agreement as signatories to the agreement, and will adopt a consistent Public School Facilities <br />Element that would embody the provisions of the Interlocal Agreement. The Capitol <br />Improvement Element would be updated annually, and the Intergovernmental Coordination <br />Element (ICE) would be adopted according to the needs of ICE in a local government. The local <br />government would monitor the school level of service standard since the level of service adopted <br />may not be exceeded. The School District boundaries would change based on the needs of the <br />School District to modify those school service areas as new schools come online, or to address that <br />development which needs to be shifted in order to balance the schools utilization. Mitigation <br />measures with a developer and the local government will have a binding agreement to address the <br />issues mitigating the impact of the development. <br /> <br />Mr. DeYoung <br /> concluded the presentation defining the best benefit of school <br />concurrency to be the awareness by all parties of residential development and how it is going to <br />impact the County’s schools. <br /> <br />5. DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS <br />Chairman Neuberger inquired what level of service was adopted by the School Board. <br />Mr. DeYoung responded that it was decided to use 100%. <br />Commissioner Wheeler thought the process was conflicting by saying the adopted level <br />of service cannot be exceeded, yet they can mitigate if they do exceed it. He wondered if the <br />Mr. De Young <br />School Board did not follow the plan, if development would come to a halt. <br />explained that the process is working in other counties, particularly Palm Beach County. If <br />everyone coordinated and worked together the process would work. <br /> <br />Ms. Mills <br />Discussion continued and explained the intent of the School District was to <br />choose the level of service standard of 100% because it was the most reasonable standard to match <br />May 3, 2006 <br />4 <br />School Concurrency Workshop Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.