Laserfiche WebLink
board with the Stipulation; for the last two or three weeks, they have been on board, according to <br />the County's outside Counsel and the landowners' Attorney. <br />Attorney Collins stated that the Board of County Commissioners was staff's client, and <br />that staff could not settle without the Commission knowing and approving the terms of the <br />Stipulation. <br />Commissioner Solari questioned the value of proceeding any further today (May 5, <br />2009), before the attorneys and the involved parties come to an agreement on the basic <br />components of the Stipulation and Lease Agreement. <br />The Board and staff continued to discuss the rationale for seeking Board approval for the <br />Stipulation and Lease Agreement. Attorney Collins advised Mrs. Stanbridge that she would <br />need to let her attorney know if the Stipulation and Lease Agreement is not acceptable to her, at <br />which time, a counterproposal or other remedy could be proposed by her attorney. <br />Mrs. Stanbridge set forth that the Stanbridges have not stipulated to anything, and she <br />was not selling her property; the County would have to take it from her. She would continue <br />deliberations through her attorneys. <br />Vice Chairman Flescher asked if there was any written confirmation that the seven <br />remaining landowners had assented to the Stipulation, and learned that Attorney DeBraal had a <br />copy of a letter from Attorney Policastro to Attorney Simon confirming the Stipulation which he <br />had laid out, pertaining to the ten landowners (listed on page 174 of the backup). <br />letter. <br />Mrs. Stanbridge made a Public Records Request for a copy of the above-mentioned <br />May 5, 2009 <br />22 <br />