Laserfiche WebLink
Bill Bethel, 66th Avenue, opposed the Board agreeing to the Stipulations prior to an <br />Order of Taking; discussed the high costs involved in a contested Order of Take; and stated that <br />he wanted to keep the Lease Agreements separate from the Stipulation. <br />Commissioner Solari wondered what would be the harm in waiting a week, to decide <br />whether each attorney has received copies of all the subject documents. <br />Attorney DeBraal saw no reason not to go forward with the other seven remaining <br />parties, while removing the three in question. <br />Commissioner Solari clarified for Mr. Bethel that the Board was not stipulating anything; <br />rather, County staff was asking the Commission, as one of the two involved parties, to say it <br />would agree to this, when the Stipulation is put together. He emphasized that until the Board <br />gives its agreement, staff cannot move this forward. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari, <br />SECONDED by Vice Chairman Flescher, to authorize <br />staff to move forward with the Stipulation for the seven <br />parties, excluding the three in question; to authorize staff <br />to deposit the specified amounts into the registry of the <br />Court for the seven parties; and to direct staff to get <br />clarification regarding the three excluded parties, from the <br />two other attorneys involved. <br />After a brief discussion, it was confirmed that Attorney DeBraal would obtain further <br />information from Attorneys Policastro and Simon regarding the three excluded parties, and <br />present an update at the May 12, 2009 Commission meeting. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 4-0 <br />vote (Commissioner Wheeler absent), the Motion carried. <br />23 <br />May 5, 2009 <br />