My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/9/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
1/9/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:51 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:18:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/09/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT IT IS -INHERENT ON US TO REMEMBER' <br />THAT SITE PLAN APPEALS DO NOT CALL FOR NOTICE TO ANYONE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED -THAT IN THIS PARTICULAR APPEAL BY <br />MR. SCHINDLER, WE HAVE HAD SUFFICIENT NOTICE OF THIS HEARING BY IT <br />BEING PUBLISHED ON THE AGENDA AND RATIFIED BY THE APPLICANT, BUT <br />THAT IF WE HAVE A CASE WHERE WE WANT TO ADVERTISE IT FOR PUBLIC <br />HEARING, WE CAN SET A DATE AND DO SO. <br />ATTORNEY BLOCK AGREED THAT THERE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENT NOTICE <br />AND NOTED THAT THE PRESS HAS COVERED IT BOTH IN THE NEWSPAPERS AND <br />ON THE RADIO. MR. BLOCK INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SITE PLAN IN <br />QUESTION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT LAST MAY STH; <br />THEY HAD WORKED FOUR MONTHS PREVIOUS TO THAT WITH ADMINISTRATOR <br />.KENNINGS; AND THEY ARE HERE TODAY STILL TRYING TO GET SOMETHING <br />ACCOMPLISHED. HE NOTED THAT MR. SCHINDLER OWNS TWO ACRES ON THE <br />SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH AVENUE AND U.S. 1, AND INGRESS AND EGRESS <br />HAS BEEN A PROBLEM SINCE THE BEGINNING BECAUSE THIS IS A HAZARDOUS <br />INTERSECTION, BUT HE BELIEVED IT HAS BECOME MORE OF A HAZARD AS 6TH <br />AVENUE HAS DEVELOPED TREMENDOUSLY. ATTORNEY BLOCK POINTED OUT THAT <br />THIS IS C-1 PROPERTY; THEY MEET THE STANDARDS AND WOULD BE WILLING <br />TO MEET ANY FURTHER IMPOSED STANDARDS IN ORDER TO HAVE THIS SITE <br />PLAN APPROVED; AND IN ADDITION, THEY HAVE ATTEMPTED TO BUY PROPERTY <br />TO CORRECT THE.ANGLE OF THE INTERSECTION AS ADVISED, BUT HAVE BEEN <br />UNABLE TO DO SO AT A REASONABLE PRICE. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY WOULD <br />LIKE TO COME TO SOME CONCLUSION TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AND AGREED <br />HIS CLIENT WOULD BE A BENEFICIARY OF SOLVING IT, BUT HE QUESTIONED <br />IF IT IS INCUMBENT ON THE PROPERTY OWNER TO REALIGN THIS STREET <br />THAT AFFECTS EVERYONE IN THE COUNTY. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF MR. BLOCK REALLY FELT IT IS <br />THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THAT PROPERTY ACCESSIBLE FOR A <br />SHOPPING CENTER , AND ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THAT PROPERTY <br />IS ALREADY DEVELOPED AND MR. SCHINDLER BOUGHT THE PROPERTY KNOWING <br />THE PROBLEM THAT EXISTED. <br />JAN 91980 <br />.• <br />low 19, MC695 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.