Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED ON THE FACT THAT THE ZONING <br />COMMISSION RECOMMENDED REZONING FOR THE ENTIRE TRACT, BUT THE LEGAL <br />AD DOES NOT INCLUDE THE AGRICULTURAL PORTION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THIS IS TWO TIER, AND AS TO <br />STATE STATUTES, IT IS CORRECT. AS TO OUR OWN ORDINANCE, THE AGRI- <br />CULTURAL IS LEFT OUT. HE FELT IF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS <br />THERE IS NO NEED, THAT UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE BOARD SHOULD <br />LIMIT ITSELF TO THE M-1 AREA. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. <br />THERE WERE NONE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, COMMISSIONER DEESON AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN FAVOR, THE <br />BOARD CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT SINCE THE BOARD IS' NOT <br />GOING TO CONSIDER THE PIECE OF AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY,WE DO NOT HAVE <br />THE PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE REZONED. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN FAVOR, THE <br />BOARD ADOPTED ORDINANCE 80-6 APPROVING THE REZONING TO R -IPM FOR <br />THE PORTION OF MR. AND MRS. VINING'S PROPERTY ZONED M-1 AND REQUIRED <br />THE PETITIONER TO SUBMIT A PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION OMITTING THE <br />TRINAGULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY ZONED AGRICULTURAL. <br />ORDINANCE 80-6 WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN <br />CORRECTED AND RECEIVED. <br />FEB 61980 <br />67 <br />800v 4 FAGS .:=w <br />J <br />