Laserfiche WebLink
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DID NOT BELIEVE WE CAN ASK <br />THEM TO START WORK WITHOUT COMING UP WITH SOME KIND OF AN AGREEMENT. <br />HE NOTED THAT IT WILL COST THE ENGINEERS MONEY TO REVIEW ALL THIS <br />INFORMATION AND THEY FEEL THAT GOING OVER THE OLD PERMITS FROM MID <br />SOUTH ENGINEERING IS PART OF THEIR SCOPE OF WORK. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONSSUGGESTED THAT WE SUPPLY REYNOLDS, <br />SMITH AND HILLS WITH THE PERMITTING INFORMATION TO REVIEW AS QUICKLY <br />AS POSSIBLE; LET THEM KNOW WE ARE UNHAPPY WITH THE 2.5 MULTIPLIER <br />AND DON'T LIKE COST PLUS AS A STARTER; AND THEN SEE WHAT WE CAN <br />NEGOTIATE. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT THIS MUST BE DONE AT THE <br />EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME AS EVERY DAY WE LOSE, IT IS GOING TO COST US <br />MORE TO BUILD THE ROAD. THE BOARD CONCURRED. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT HE WILL PROCEED <br />AS INSTRUCTED. <br />CHARLES SWALLOWS OF THE .JOINT VENTURE REPORTED ON THE <br />201 PLAN, NOTING THAT HE HAS BEEN WORKING ON THIS PROJECT FIVE YEARS <br />AND FEELS THAT AFTER ALL THIS TIME, WE FINALLY HAVE A DIRECTION. <br />HE NOTED THAT LAST JANUARY WE SUBMITTED OUR 201 REPORT TO THE A-95 <br />AGENCIES FOR THEIR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AND HAD SET UP A PUBLIC HEARING <br />FOR AROUND THE EARLY PART OF LAST .JUNE. AS A PART OF THAT PARTICULAR <br />SUBMITTAL, WE HAD A TWO -PLANT CONFIGURATION, WHICH PROVIDED FOR THE <br />DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO GO DIRECT INTO THE RIVER IN TWO PHASES. SINCE <br />THAT TIME, WE HAVE PROPOSED TO GO THROUGH THE MOSQUITO CONTROL <br />IMPOUNDMENTS FIRST INSTEAD OF PUTTING NUTRIENTS DIRECTLY INTO THE - <br />RIVER. MR. SWALLOWS NOTED THAT STUDIES DONE AT VISTA ROYALE SHOWED <br />A 80-90% REDUCTION OF NUTRIENTS BY THIS METHOD. HE CONTINUED TO <br />DISCUSS THE PROPOSED IMPOUNDMENT SYSTEM WHICH REQUIRES ABOUT 300 <br />ACRES, NOTING THAT THIS ALL HAPPENED ABOUT APRIL OF LAST YEAR, AND <br />THE QUESTION THAT AROSE WAS WHETHER THIS METHOD WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE <br />TO THE REGULATORY AGENCIES. THE ANSWER WAS YES, BUT ONLY IF IT <br />MEETS CERTAIN CRITERIA, AND ONE CRITERIA IS THAT THIS AREA COULD NOT <br />BE WITHIN THE WATERS OF THE STATE. MR. SWALLOWS CONTINUED THAT IT <br />f E B 61980 BOOK 42 FA&E X72 <br />75 <br />