My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/6/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
2/6/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:51 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:21:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/06/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F E 0 61980 Boas 42 parE 671 <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED WHETHER WE HAVE TO PAY REYNOLDS, <br />SMITH & HILLS TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF WORK. <br />COMMISSIONER -LYONS NOTED THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO REVIEW <br />THIS MATERIAL IN ANY EVENT,AND HE FELT THEY CAME UP WITH SUCH A HIGH <br />LUMP SUM FIGURE BECAUSE THEY HAD NO ACCURATE CONCEPT OF WHERE•WE <br />STOOD IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERMITTING SINCE THEY HAVE NOT HAD THE <br />BENEFIT OF SEEING ALL THE MATERIAL THAT IS AVAILABLE. HE, THEREFORE, <br />FELT WE SHOULD GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO REVIEW ALL THE PERTINENT INFORMA- <br />TION TO SEE IF THEY WILL COME UP WITH A LOWER LUMP SUM FIGURE. HE <br />EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING THINGS MOVING WHILE WE NEGOTIATE. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON CONCURRED THAT THE REASON <br />FOR THE 2.5 MULTIPLIER IS BECAUSE THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT CANNOT <br />BE IDENTIFIED ADEQUATELY. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ALSO AGREED THAT REYNOLDS, SMITH <br />AND HILLS HAVE ESTIMATED THEIR LUMP SUM FIGURE BASED ON THE WORST <br />SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES THEY MIGHT POSSIBLY ENCOUNTER BECAUSE OF IN- <br />SUFFICIENT INFORMATION. HE THEN REPORTED THAT MID SOUTH ENGINEERING <br />HAS AGREED TO RELEASE ALL THE INFORMATION ON THE PERMITTING WORK <br />THEY HAVE DONE, FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PAID, AND IT IS IN THE MAILS <br />' AND SHOULD BE RECEIVED SHORTLY. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THE PLAN IS TO PROCEED WITH THE <br />ACTUAL ENGINEERING ON A COST PLUS BASIS, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS <br />STATED THAT THE MAIN PROBLEM IS THE PERMITTING; THERE IS A CERTAIN <br />AMOUNT OF ENGINEERING, BUT IT IS NOT THE MAJOR PART. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN ASKED IF THEY WOULD BE WORKING ON <br />GETTING THE PERMITS ON A COST PLUS BASIS, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED <br />THAT THEY WOULD, <br />COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED <br />FOR THE ENGINEERS TO GET A REAL IDEA OF WHAT IS INVOLVED. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ESTIMATED APPROXIMATELY 30 <br />DAYS; BUT NOTED THAT THE ATTORNEY HAD FELT IT WOULD ONLY BE TWO HOURS. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF WE CANT MAKE THE INFORMATION <br />FROM MID SOUTH ENGINEERING AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEERS AND THEN GET <br />A NEW PROPOSAL AND TALK ABOUT THEIR FACTOR. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.