My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/3/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
6/3/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 2:35:34 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/03/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2570
Book and Page
125, 408-440
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
497
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Larry Schlitt, 656 Bougainvillea Lane, is owner and managing member of the Farms <br />Subdivision. He provided a handout (copy is on file with the backup) showing a detailed <br />chronology of events regarding his request to provide an access road to the Farms Subdivision off <br />661h Avenue, away from industrial traffic, in lieu of 51h Street SW. This request was granted <br />provided he construct a 22' paved secondary access to 51h Street SW and donate all <br />rights -of -way -for 51h Street SW and 661h Avenue. <br />Mr. Schlitt displayed aerial photographs of the subdivision and accessory road using a <br />PowerPoint presentation (copy is on file with the backup). He pointed out that when a traffic light <br />is placed at 51h Street SW and 661h Avenue, the access road traffic will not be affected by the traffic <br />light and will present a safety issue. He concluded the 51h Street SW access road should not be <br />required due to lack of safety measures and he is seeking reimbursement for additional costs that he <br />incurred based on the County's criteria. <br />Commissioner Lowther questioned why we required this supplemental access road when <br />other existing developments have only one access road. <br />County Administrator James Chandler explained that the plans were denied originally <br />because of future expansion plans on 661h Avenue up to 601h Street in order to avoid having too <br />many accesses by developments on a major roadway. Mr. Schlitt appealed that decision and after <br />a great deal of discussion, they compromised and agreed to permit access on 661h and to keep the <br />supplemental access. <br />Mr. Schlitt admitted that he did agree to the supplemental access road in the very early <br />stages of the project, however, he emphasized that this road is not necessary and it is not going to <br />solve any problems as far as safety is concerned. He hoped that the County would work with him. <br />Commissioner Adams inquired if this was an affidavit of exemption or a subdivision process <br />and Mr. Schlitt responded that it is an affidavit of exemption. <br />Commissioner Adams felt the whole intent of having an affidavit of exemption was the <br />ability to split larger tracts and continue smaller agricultural developments. In this case, agricultural <br />development was not intended, it was actually designed for Planned Development and not a <br />subdivision process. <br />Administrator Chandler said safety was the reason for not permitting the access road in the <br />first place. <br />Commissioner Ginn inquired what year the widening of 661h Avenue would begin. <br />June 3, 2003 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.