Laserfiche WebLink
Larry Schlitt, 656 Bougainvillea Lane, is owner and managing member of the Farms <br />Subdivision. He provided a handout (copy is on file with the backup) showing a detailed <br />chronology of events regarding his request to provide an access road to the Farms Subdivision off <br />661h Avenue, away from industrial traffic, in lieu of 51h Street SW. This request was granted <br />provided he construct a 22' paved secondary access to 51h Street SW and donate all <br />rights -of -way -for 51h Street SW and 661h Avenue. <br />Mr. Schlitt displayed aerial photographs of the subdivision and accessory road using a <br />PowerPoint presentation (copy is on file with the backup). He pointed out that when a traffic light <br />is placed at 51h Street SW and 661h Avenue, the access road traffic will not be affected by the traffic <br />light and will present a safety issue. He concluded the 51h Street SW access road should not be <br />required due to lack of safety measures and he is seeking reimbursement for additional costs that he <br />incurred based on the County's criteria. <br />Commissioner Lowther questioned why we required this supplemental access road when <br />other existing developments have only one access road. <br />County Administrator James Chandler explained that the plans were denied originally <br />because of future expansion plans on 661h Avenue up to 601h Street in order to avoid having too <br />many accesses by developments on a major roadway. Mr. Schlitt appealed that decision and after <br />a great deal of discussion, they compromised and agreed to permit access on 661h and to keep the <br />supplemental access. <br />Mr. Schlitt admitted that he did agree to the supplemental access road in the very early <br />stages of the project, however, he emphasized that this road is not necessary and it is not going to <br />solve any problems as far as safety is concerned. He hoped that the County would work with him. <br />Commissioner Adams inquired if this was an affidavit of exemption or a subdivision process <br />and Mr. Schlitt responded that it is an affidavit of exemption. <br />Commissioner Adams felt the whole intent of having an affidavit of exemption was the <br />ability to split larger tracts and continue smaller agricultural developments. In this case, agricultural <br />development was not intended, it was actually designed for Planned Development and not a <br />subdivision process. <br />Administrator Chandler said safety was the reason for not permitting the access road in the <br />first place. <br />Commissioner Ginn inquired what year the widening of 661h Avenue would begin. <br />June 3, 2003 12 <br />