2/27/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F E 0 2 71900 SOOF 42, PPGE 7,93 (1) THE NEED FOR MEETING THE TIME SCHEDULE SHOULD BE REEMPHASIZED AND (Z) THE SELECTION OF THE PROJECT SUPERVISOR SHOULD BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED FOR A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF JOBS DONE BY REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC. MR. SINGH INFORMED THE BOARD THAT REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION HAD SOME SCHEDULING PROBLEMS WITH THE SOUTHERN BELL BUILDING IN SEBASTIAN, BUT NO SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA BUILDINGS. HE CONTINUED THAT HE ALSO CHECKED ON QUALIFICATION OF THE SUB- CONTRACTOR AND, WHILE HE SHOULD NOT PUBLICLY DISCLOSE NAMES UNTIL AFTER THE AWARD, THE SUBCONTRACTOR HAS BEEN IN BUSINESS OVER FOURTEEN YEARS AND HAS BEEN GIVEN A GOOD RATING BY SUPPLIERS. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF THIS APPLIED TO ONE OR ALL SUB- CONTRACTORS. MR. SINGH STATED HE WAS REFERRING TO THE AIR CONDITIONING AND MECHANICAL SUBCONTRACTOR AND ALSO PLUMBING AND FIRE PROTECTION, BUT HE HAS NOT YET BEEN TOTALLY ABLE TO CHECK OUT THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAS COMPLETE RE- SPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY OVER THE SUBCONTRACTORS HE USES. COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THEY HAD FOUND ANY PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH WORKMANSHIP ON THE JOBS CHECKED, AND MR. SINGH STATED THAT NONE WERE MENTIONED TO THEM. HERCULES KONTOULAS, CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE CHECKED WITH SOME ARCHITECTS IN FORT PIERCE WHERE REINHOLD DID WORK MANY YEARS AGO,.AND FROM ALL INDICATIONS, THE WORKMANSHIP WAS GOOD AND THE COMPLETION OF THE "PUNCH LIST It OR TIME SCHEDULE WAS SATISFACTORY. HE STATED THAT THE PARTICULAR JOB HE WAS THINKING OF IS THE OPEN CONCEPT SCHOOL IN STUART, AND HE ALSO CHECKED WITH ARCHITECT GEORGE ASCOT OF FORT PIERCE AND HAD A FAVORABLE REACTION. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE LIST OF PROJECTS PRESENTED BY REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC. WAS QUITE IMPRESSIVE.