2/27/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE FINE ARTS BUILDING AND THE ALLIED HEALTH CENTER FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY -COLLEGE WHICH ARE ON THE LIST SUBMITTED BY REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, AND MR. KONTOULAS BELIEVED THAT DAVID ROBISON WAS THE ARCHITECT FOR THESE, BUT HE HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ENTERED THE MEETING AT 11:20 O'CLOCK A.M. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THERE IS ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRINCIPALS OF THE REINHOLD COMPANY, AND MR. SINGH STATED THAT INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THEIR BID. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND MR. ,SINGH INFORMED HIM THAT THEY HAVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ONLY ON THE SURETY COMPANY, ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT, IN OTHER WORDS, THEY HAVE NO CONCERN FOR THE CAPITALIZATION OF THE CONTRACTOR AS LONG AS HE IS BONDABLE, AND MR. SINGH AGREED THAT WAS TRUE SINCE THE BOND GUARANTEES THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AND PERFORMANCE OF THE SUBCONTRACTORS. IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT REINHOLD CON- STRUCTION DID NOT SUBMIT A COMBINATION BASE BID, BUT BID SEPARATELY ON THE TWO PROJECTS. DISCUSSION THEN FOLLOWED ON THE ALTERNATIVE BIDS SUBMITTED, BEING $400 PER WINDOW UNIT BY REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION AND A FIGURE OF $45,885 BEING GIVEN BY CLIFTON CONSTRUCTION. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE REINHOLD BID WOULD BE, AND MR, KONTOULAS AND MR. SINGH EXPLAINED THAT THE BIDDERS WERE NOT GIVEN A FIXED AMOUNT OF WINDOWS, BUT WERE JUST ASKED TO GIVE A UNIT PRICE. MR. KONTOULAS ESTIMATED THERE WERE 96 DOUBLE WINDOWS AND 48 6 x 6. HE CONTINUED THAT THE VICE PRESIDENT OF CLIFTON CONSTRUCTION CALLED HIM AND STATED THAT HE MISINTERPRETED THE DIRECTIONS AND GAVE A TOTAL PRICE FOR REPLACING ALL THE WINDOWS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE WINDOW UNIT IS TWO WINDOWS COMBINED, AND MR. KONTOULAS INFORMED HIM THAT THE SPECIFICATIONS STATE A UNIT IS A 6 X 6 OPENING. 3 eooK 42 PAGE 794 FEB 2 71990 0�,