Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Fred Kreschner <br />Attorney, representing the Developer of Commander Groves, defined the <br />avigation easement that will be recorded in public records for everyone who buys a parcel of <br />property for future development to know the existence of the airport. The actual airspace to the <br />avigation pattern provides for airspace above the development for taking off and landing in the <br />airstrip. <br /> <br />There was a lengthy discussion and questions were posed by the Board to staff regarding <br />RS-3 zoning and the Developer’s choice of developing a subdivision instead of a PD. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Wheeler’s question, County Attorney Collins advised that a <br />developer would not be able to come in and change the clear zone, because it is in the nature of a <br />recorded easement. <br /> <br />Eugene O’Neil <br />, Gould Cooksey Fennell O’Neil Marine Carter & Hafner Law Firm, <br />representing John and Kathy Schumann, owner of the private test track property at Aerodrome, <br />discussed an agreement reached with the Developer called a “noise easement”. This is separate <br />and distinct from the avigation easement that includes a setback and buffer. He said the <br />Schumann’s are in favor of the avigation easement, and they do not oppose the rezoning at this <br />time. <br /> <br />The Chairman called for a recess at 10:39 a.m., and he reconvened the meeting at 10:48 <br />a.m. with all members present. <br /> <br />Discussion continued regarding a clear zone. <br /> <br />There were no additional speakers and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />JULY 11, 2006 <br />22 <br /> <br />