My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
3/19/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:19:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR -1 9 1980 - - - wuo . 43 PAGE 22 <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS ADVISED THAT THE CITY, <br />HAS ALREADY GIVEN A QUIT -CLAIM DEED FOR THE BALANCE OF THE ROAD, <br />AFTER DISCUSSION, IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE PARCEL WAS A <br />NUISANCE AND VERY SMALL - 15' X 50', <br />ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID SUBMITTED BY SUSAN L. <br />SCOTT FOR $150.00 FOR THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF STREET RAW <br />FORMALLY KNOWN AS LEMON AVENUE LYING BETWEEN LOT 11 OF W. R. DUNCANS <br />RESUBDIVISION AND LOT 4 OF JONES SUBDIVISION, AS ADVERTISED IN THE <br />NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE ON MARCH 2 AND 91 1980 IN THE VERO BEACH <br />PRESS JOURNAL. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT THE BOARD WOULD REVIEW <br />CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS HIGHWAY AND <br />LINDSEY ROAD AS REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY SHERMAN SMITH, JR. AND ASKED <br />THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS FIRST SPEAK ON THIS SUBJECT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS A <br />DEFENDANT IN CURRENT LITIGATION REGARDING THIS FACILITY, AND HE FELT IT <br />IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE COMMISSIONERS TO GET INVOLVED IN A DISCUSSION <br />ON THIS SUBJECT UNTIL THE LITIGATION IS COMPLETED, ALTHOUGH THEY MAY <br />HEAR MR. SMITHS PRESENTATION. <br />ATTORNEY SMITH TOOK THE FLOOR AND STATED THAT HE IS SORRY <br />THE COUNTY'S ATTORNEY TAKES THAT POSITION BECAUSE THERE IS NO LITIGATION; <br />THE COUNTY MADE APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT AND THERE IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE <br />HEARING PENDING. -f1E EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT CITIZENS ASKING TO BE <br />HEARD AND BEING TOLI3;IN EFFECT, THAT THE BOARD WILL SIT AND LISTEN <br />BUT NOT PARTICIPATE.- <br />ATTORNEY <br />ARTICIPATE. <br />ATTORNEY SMITH -INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY ARE NOT HERE <br />TO TAKE ISSUE WITH THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE DER, FOR THE PURPOSES <br />OF THIS HEARING, THEY AGREE THAT THE RECOMMENDED ORDER IS IN ALL <br />RESPECTS PROPER; THEY WOULD NOT EXPECT THE BOARD TO DO OR SAY ANYTHING <br />IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE DER; AND THEY DID NOT <br />FEEL THAT WHAT ATTORNEY SMITH WILL SAY WILL AFFECT THOSE PROCEEDINGS. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.