My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
3/19/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:19:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R 191980 <br />- WOK .43 .PAGE'° . <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT IT IS POSSIBLE WE COULD <br />ACQUIRE ANOTHER SITE AND THEN HAVE ANOTHtR 1200 PETITIONS SUBMITTED <br />AGAINST THAT SITE. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THIS COULD ALL TAKE A GOOD DEAL <br />OF TIME, AND ATTORNEY SMITH STATED THAT IF THEY CONTINUE TO PURSUE <br />THIS MATTER WITH ALL THEIR RESOURCES, THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TIME TO ACQUIRE <br />ANOTHER SITE MANY TIMES OVER. HE THANKED THE BOARD FOR LETTING HIM <br />MAKE HIS PRESENTATION. <br />UTILITY DIRECTOR GEORGE LINER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS <br />THE PROPOSED UTILITY IMPACT FEES AND PROCEDURES, AND STATED THAT THERE <br />ARE THREE DOCUMENTS IN THE PACKAGE HE SUBMITTED, WHICH HE WOULD LIKE <br />TO START OUT WITH - (1) OUR POSITION ON THE 6TH AVENUE FORCE MAIN, <br />WHICH HE NEEDS TO USE TO INFORM THE DEVELOPERS, (2) PROCEDURES FOR <br />THE UTILITY DEVELOPER EITHER WITHIN THE FRANCHISE OR CONNECTING TO <br />THE COUNTY SYSTEM, AND (3) A DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT FOR TYING ONTO THE <br />COUNTY SYSTEM. THERE ARE ALSO TWO PROPOSED ORDINANCES FOR IMPACT FEES <br />AND ONE FOR AN AMENDMENT OF AN EXISTING ORDINANCE. MR. LINER STATED <br />THAT THE IMPACT FEE IS BASED ON THREE COMPONENTS - THE PLANT DEMAND, <br />HYDRAULIC LOAD ON THE MAIN, AND UTILITY INSPECTIONS AND CHARGES BASED <br />ON NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS. <br />MR. LINER NOTED THAT HIS MEMO OF FEBRUARY 15TH IN REGARD TO <br />THE STATUS OF THE 6TH AVENUE FORCE MAIN POINTS OUT THAT THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH REQUIRES THAT THE COUNTY BE ABLE TO METER THE SEWAGE COMING <br />FROM THE FORCE MAINr-AND THE REQUIRED METER CANNOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL <br />SOME TIME IN MAY. HE- -CONTINUED THAT MEETINGS HAVE BEEN HELD WITH THE <br />CITY TO DETERMINE AWAY TO METER THE WATER UNTIL THE SEWAGE METER IS <br />INSTALLED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF WE HAVE ANYTHING CONCRETE ON THIS, <br />AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT ALTHOUGH THERE IS NOTHING FORMAL IN <br />WRITING, HE BELIEVED THERE IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE UNDERSTANDING. <br />MR. LINER STATED THAT ACTUALLY THIS TYPE OF THING HAS BEEN <br />DISCUSSED IN THE PENDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY, THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH AND THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, BUT IN THE MEANTIME, <br />32 = <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.